Abstract
The central dogma of molecular biology entails that genetic information is transferred from nucleic acid to proteins. Notwithstanding retro-transcribing genetic elements, DNA is transcribed to RNA which in turn is translated into proteins. Recent advancements have shown that each stage is regulated to control protein abundances for a variety of essential physiological processes. In this regard, mRNA regulation is essential in fine-tuning or calibrating protein abundances. In this review, we would like to discuss one of several mRNA-intrinsic features of mRNA regulation that has been gaining traction of recent—codon bias and optimality. Specifically, we address the effects of codon bias with regard to codon optimality in several biological processes centred on translation, such as mRNA stability and protein folding among others. Finally, we examine how different organisms or cell types, through this system, are able to coordinate physiological pathways to respond to a variety of stress or growth conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goel NS et al (1972) A method for calculating codon frequencies in DNA. J Theor Biol 35(3):399–457
Post LE et al (1979) Nucleotide sequence of the ribosomal protein gene cluster adjacent to the gene for RNA polymerase subunit beta in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76(4):1697–1701
Grantham R et al (1980) Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res 8(1):r49-62
Presnyak V et al (2015) Codon optimality is a major determinant of mRNA stability. Cell 160(6):1111–1124
Pechmann S, Frydman J (2013) Evolutionary conservation of codon optimality reveals hidden signatures of cotranslational folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(2):237–243
Bazzini AA et al (2016) Codon identity regulates mRNA stability and translation efficiency during the maternal-to-zygotic transition. EMBO J. 35(9):2087–2103
Hershberg R, Petrov DA (2008) Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet 42:287–299
Drummond DA, Wilke CO (2008) Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134(2):341–352
Zhou T, Weems M, Wilke CO (2009) Translationally optimal codons associate with structurally sensitive sites in proteins. Mol Biol Evol 26(7):1571–1580
Stoletzki N, Eyre-Walker A (2007) Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy. Mol Biol Evol 24(2):374–381
Ran W, Higgs PG (2012) Contributions of speed and accuracy to translational selection in bacteria. PloS One 7:e51652
Ran W, Higgs PG (2010) The influence of anticodon-codon interactions and modified bases on codon usage bias in bacteria. Mol Biol Evol 27:2129–2140
Shabalina SA, Spiridonov NA, Kashina A (2013) Sounds of silence: synonymous nucleotides as a key to biological regulation and complexity. Nucleic Acids Res 41, 2073–2094
Rodnina MV (2016) The ribosome in action: Tuning of translational efficiency and protein folding. Protein Sci 25:1390–1406
Hanson G, Coller J (2018) Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 19(1):20–30
Brule CE, Grayhack EJ (2017) Synonymous codons: choose wisely for expression. Trends Genet 33(4):283–297
Dever TE, Dinman JD, Green R (2018) Translation elongation and recoding in Eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 10(8):a032649
Sauna ZE, Chava K-S (2011) Understanding the contribution of synonymous mutations to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 12:683–691
Chaney JL, Clark PL (2015) Roles for synonymous codon usage. Protein Biog. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-060414-034333
Quax TE et al (2015) Codon bias as a means to fine-tune gene expression. Mol Cell 59(2):149–161
Tuller T, Zur H (2015) Multiple roles of the coding sequence 5′ end in gene expression regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 43(1):13–28
Zur H et al (2020) Predictive biophysical modeling and understanding of the dynamics of mRNA translation and its evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 44(19):9031–9049
Bali V, Bebok Z (2015) Decoding mechanisms by which silent codon changes influence protein biogenesis and function. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 64:58–74
Komar AA (2016) The Yin and Yang of codon usage. Hum Mol Genet 25(R2):R77–R85
Goz E, Zur H, Tuller T (2017) Hidden silent codes in viral genomes. Evolutionary biology: self/nonself evolution, species and complex traits evolution methods and concepts. Springer, Cham, pp 87–110
Bergman S, Tuller T (2020) Widespread non-modular overlapping codes in the coding regions. Phys Biol 17(3):031002
Sharp PM, Li WH (1987) The codon Adaptation Index–a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 15(3):1281–1295
dos Reis M, Savva R, Wernisch L (2004) Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection. Nucleic Acids Res 32(17):5036–5044
Ikemura T (1981) Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. J Mol Biol 146(1):1–21
Percudani R, Pavesi A, Ottonello S (1997) Transfer RNA gene redundancy and translational selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol 268(2):322–330
Duret L (2000) tRNA gene number and codon usage in the C. elegans genome are co-adapted for optimal translation of highly expressed genes. Trends Genet 16(7):287–289
Sabi R, Tuller T (2014) Modelling the efficiency of codon–tRNA interactions based on codon usage bias. DNA Res 21:511–526
Sabi R, Volvovitch Daniel R, Tuller T (2017) stAIcalc: tRNA adaptation index calculator based on species-specific weights. Bioinformatics 33(4):589–591
Zhang G et al (2010) Global and local depletion of ternary complex limits translational elongation. Nucleic Acids Res 38(14):4778–4787
Dana A, Tuller T (2014) The effect of tRNA levels on decoding times of mRNA codons. Nucleic Acids Res 42(14):9171–9181
Elf J et al (2003) Selective charging of tRNA isoacceptors explains patterns of codon usage. Science 300(5626):1718–1722
Wu Q et al (2019) Translation affects mRNA stability in a codon-dependent manner in human cells. Elife 8:e45396. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45396
Forrest ME et al (2020) Codon and amino acid content are associated with mRNA stability in mammalian cells. PLoS One 15:e0228730
Narula A, Ellis J, Taliaferro JM, Rissland OS (2019) Coding regions affect mRNA stability in human cells. RNA 25:1751–1764
Hia F et al (2019) Codon bias confers stability to human mRNAs. EMBO Rep 20(11):e48220
Pop C et al (2014) Causal signals between codon bias, mRNA structure, and the efficiency of translation and elongation. Mol Syst Biol 10:770
Pringle ES, McCormick C, Cheng Z (2019) Polysome profiling analysis of mRNA and associated proteins engaged in translation. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 125(1):e79
Riba A et al (2019) Protein synthesis rates and ribosome occupancies reveal determinants of translation elongation rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:15023–15032
Shine J, Dalgarno L (1975) Determinant of cistron specificity in bacterial ribosomes. Nature 254(5495):34–38
Marilyn K (1989) The scanning model for translation: an update. J Cell Biol 108:229–241
Bentele K, Saffert P, Rauscher R, Ignatova Z, Blüthgen N (2013) Efficient translation initiation dictates codon usage at gene start. Mol Syst Biol 9:675
Goodman DB, Church GM, Kosuri S (2013) Causes and effects of N-terminal codon bias in bacterial genes. Science 342(6157):475–479
Kudla G et al (2009) Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science 324(5924):255–258
Verma M et al (2019) A short translational ramp determines the efficiency of protein synthesis. Nat Commun 10(1):5774
Tuller T et al (2010) An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation. Cell 141(2):344–354
Dobrzynski M, Bruggeman FJ (2009) Elongation dynamics shape bursty transcription and translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(8):2583–2588
Keller TE et al (2012) Reduced mRNA secondary-structure stability near the start codon indicates functional genes in prokaryotes. Genome Biol Evol 4(2):80–88
Grosjean H, Fiers W (1982) Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes. Gene 18(3):199–209
Grosjean H et al (1978) Bacteriophage MS2 RNA: a correlation between the stability of the codon: anticodon interaction and the choice of code words. J Mol Evol 12(2):113–119
Gauss DH, Sprinzl M (1981) Compilation of tRNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 9(1):r1–r23
Pedersen S (1984) Escherichia coli ribosomes translate in vivo with variable rate. Embo j 3(12):2895–2898
Sorensen MA, Pedersen S (1991) Absolute in vivo translation rates of individual codons in Escherichia coli. The two glutamic acid codons GAA and GAG are translated with a threefold difference in rate. J Mol Biol 222(2):265–280
Sorensen MA, Kurland CG, Pedersen S (1989) Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 207(2):365–377
Frumkin I et al (2018) Codon usage of highly expressed genes affects proteome-wide translation efficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(21):E4940-e4949
Gobet C et al (2020) Robust landscapes of ribosome dwell times and aminoacyl-tRNAs in response to nutrient stress in liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117(17):9630–9641
Carlini DB, Stephan W (2003) In vivo introduction of unpreferred synonymous codons into the Drosophila Adh gene results in reduced levels of ADH protein. Genetics 163(1):239–243
Mishima Y, Tomari Y (2016) Codon usage and 3’ UTR length determine maternal mRNA stability in zebrafish. Mol Cell 61(6):874–885
Zhou Z et al (2016) Codon usage is an important determinant of gene expression levels largely through its effects on transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E6117–E6125
Yu CH et al (2015) Codon usage influences the local rate of translation elongation to regulate co-translational protein folding. Mol Cell 59(5):744–754
Jin HY, Xiao C (2018) An integrated polysome profiling and ribosome profiling method to investigate in vivo translatome. Methods Mol Biol 1712:1–18
Lampson BL et al (2013) Rare codons regulate KRas oncogenesis. Curr Biol 23(1):70–75
Fu J, Dang Y, Counter C, Liu Y (2018) Codon usage regulates human KRAS expression at both transcriptional and translational levels. J Biol Chem 293:17929–17940
Ingolia NT et al (2009) Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324(5924):218–223
McGlincy NJ, Ingolia NT (2017) Transcriptome-wide measurement of translation by ribosome profiling. Methods 126:112–129
Charneski CA, Hurst LD (2013) Positively charged residues are the major determinants of ribosomal velocity. PLoS Biol 11(3):e1001508
Ingolia NT, Lareau LF, Weissman JS (2011) Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell 147(4):789–802
Li GW, Oh E, Weissman JS (2012) The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria. Nature 484(7395):538–541
Qian W et al (2012) Balanced codon usage optimizes eukaryotic translational efficiency. PLoS Genet 8(3):e1002603
Artieri CG, Fraser HB (2014) Accounting for biases in riboprofiling data indicates a major role for proline in stalling translation. Genome Res 24(12):2011–2021
Weinberg DE et al (2016) Improved ribosome-footprint and mRNA measurements provide insights into dynamics and regulation of yeast translation. Cell Rep 14(7):1787–1799
Gardin J et al (2014) Measurement of average decoding rates of the 61 sense codons in vivo. Elife 3.
Nakahigashi K et al (2014) Effect of codon adaptation on codon-level and gene-level translation efficiency in vivo. BMC Genomics 15:1115
Gerashchenko MV, Glagyshev VN (2017) Ribonuclease selection for ribosome profiling. Nucleic Acids Res 45:e6
Gerashchenko MV, Gladyshev VN (2014) Translation inhibitors cause abnormalities in ribosome profiling experiments. Nucleic Acids Res 42:e134
Wright G et al (2020) Analysis of computational codon usage models and their association with translationally slow codons. PLoS ONE 15(4):e0232003
Diament A, Tuller T (2016) Estimation of ribosome profiling performance and reproducibility at various levels of resolution. Biology Direct. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-016-0127-4
Lareau LF et al (2014) Distinct stages of the translation elongation cycle revealed by sequencing ribosome-protected mRNA fragments. Elife 3:e01257. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01257
Hussmann JA et al (2015) Understanding biases in ribosome profiling experiments reveals signatures of translation dynamics in yeast. PLoS Genet 11(12):e1005732
Santos DA et al (2019) Cycloheximide can distort measurements of mRNA levels and translation efficiency. Nucleic Acids Res 47(10):4974–4985
Pelechano V, Wei W, Steinmetz LM (2015) Widespread co-translational RNA decay reveals ribosome dynamics. Cell 161(6):1400–1412
Pelechano V, Wei W, Steinmetz LM (2016) Genome-wide quantification of 5’-phosphorylated mRNA degradation intermediates for analysis of ribosome dynamics. Nat Protoc 11(2):359–376
Ingolia NT et al (2012) The ribosome profiling strategy for monitoring translation in vivo by deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA fragments. Nat Protoc 7(8):1534–1550
Young DJ et al (2015) Rli1/ABCE1 recycles terminating ribosomes and controls translation reinitiation in 3′UTRs in vivo. Cell 162(4):872–884
Guydosh NR, Green R (2014) Dom34 rescues ribosomes in 3’ untranslated regions. Cell 156(5):950–962
Shah P et al (2013) Rate-limiting steps in yeast protein translation. Cell 153(7):1589–1601
Archer SK et al (2016) Dynamics of ribosome scanning and recycling revealed by translation complex profiling. Nature 535(7613):570–574
Zlotorynski E (2016) Profiling ribosome dynamics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17(9):535–535
Oh E et al (2011) Selective ribosome profiling reveals the cotranslational chaperone action of trigger factor in vivo. Cell 147(6):1295–1308
Schibich D et al (2016) Global profiling of SRP interaction with nascent polypeptides. Nature 536(7615):219–223
Galmozzi CV et al (2019) Selective ribosome profiling to study interactions of translating ribosomes in yeast. Nat Protoc 14(8):2279–2317
Shiber A et al (2018) Cotranslational assembly of protein complexes in eukaryotes revealed by ribosome profiling. Nature 561(7722):268–272
Wu CC et al (2020) Ribosome collisions trigger general stress responses to regulate cell fate. Cell 182(2):404-416e14
Ikeuchi K et al (2019) Collided ribosomes form a unique structural interface to induce Hel2-driven quality control pathways. EMBO J. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018100276
Tesina P et al (2020) Molecular mechanism of translational stalling by inhibitory codon combinations and poly(A) tracts. EMBO J. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2019103365
Diament A et al (2018) The extent of ribosome queuing in budding yeast. PLoS Comput Biol 14(1):e1005951
Gamble CE et al (2016) Adjacent codons act in concert to modulate translation efficiency in yeast. Cell 166(3):679–690
Matsuo Y et al (2017) Ubiquitination of stalled ribosome triggers ribosome-associated quality control. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00188-10
Han P et al (2020) Genome-wide survey of ribosome collision. Cell Rep 31(5):107610
Meydon S, Guydosh NR (2020) Disome and trisome profiling reveal genome-wide targets of ribosome quality control. Mol Cell 79(4):588–602.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.010
Rooijers K et al (2013) Ribosome profiling reveals features of normal and disease-associated mitochondrial translation. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3886
Gonzalez C et al (2014) Ribosome profiling reveals a cell-type-specific translational landscape in brain tumors. J Neurosci. 34(33):10924–10936
Stern-Ginossar N, Ingolia NT (2015) Ribosome profiling as a tool to decipher viral complexity. Annu Rev Virol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-100114-054854
Peltz SW, Donahue JL, Jacobson A (1992) A mutation in the tRNA nucleotidyltransferase gene promotes stabilization of mRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 12(12):5778–5784
Herrick D, Parker R, Jacobson A (1990) Identification and comparison of stable and unstable mRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 10(5):2269–2284
Kurosaki T, Myers JR, Maquat LE (2019) Defining nonsense-mediated mRNA decay intermediates in human cells. Methods 155:68–76
Antic S et al (2015) General and microRNA-mediated mRNA degradation occurs on ribosome complexes in drosophila cells. Mol Cell Biol 35(13):2309–2320
Graille M, Seraphin B (2012) Surveillance pathways rescuing eukaryotic ribosomes lost in translation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13(11):727–735
Shoemaker CJ, Green R (2012) Translation drives mRNA quality control. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19(6):594–601
Hu W et al (2009) Co-translational mRNA decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 461(7261):225–229
Coller J, Parker R (2005) General translational repression by activators of mRNA decapping. Cell 122(6):875–886
Coller JM et al (2001) The DEAD box helicase, Dhh1p, functions in mRNA decapping and interacts with both the decapping and deadenylase complexes. RNA 7(12):1717–1727
Sweet T, Kovalak C, Coller J (2012) The DEAD-box protein Dhh1 promotes decapping by slowing ribosome movement. PLoS Biol 10(6):e1001342
Harigaya Y, Parker R (2016) Analysis of the association between codon optimality and mRNA stability in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. BMC Genomics 17(1):895
de Freitas NJ et al (2018) Codon choice directs constitutive mRNA levels in trypanosomes. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32467
Jeacock L, Faria J, Horn D (2018) Codon usage bias controls mRNA and protein abundance in trypanosomatids. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32496
Buschauer R et al (2020) The Ccr4-Not complex monitors the translating ribosome for codon optimality. Science 368(6488):eaay6912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay6912
Tesina P et al (2019) Structure of the 80S ribosome-Xrn1 nuclease complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 26(4):275–280
Radhakrishnan A et al (2016) The DEAD-box protein Dhh1p couples mRNA decay and translation by monitoring codon optimality. Cell 167(1):122-132.e9
He F, Celik A, Wu C, Jacobson A (2018) General decapping activators target different subsets of inefficiently translated mRNAs. Elife 7:e34409. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34409
Freimer JW, Hu T, Blelloch R (2018) Decoupling the impact of microRNAs on translational repression versus RNA degradation in embryonic stem cells. Elife 7:e38014. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38014
Courel M et al (2019) GC content shapes mRNA storage and decay in human cells. Elife 8:e49708. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49708
Hanson G et al (2018) Translation elongation and mRNA stability are coupled through the ribosomal A-site. RNA 1377–1389.
Dao Duc K, Song YS (2018) The impact of ribosomal interference, codon usage, and exit tunnel interactions on translation elongation rate variation. PLoS Genet
Schwartz DC, Parker R (1999) Mutations in translation initiation factors lead to increased rates of deadenylation and decapping of mRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 5247–5256.
Schwartz DC, Parker R (2000) mRNA decapping in yeast requires dissociation of the cap binding protein, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E. Mol Cell Biol 20:7933–7942
Edri S, Tuller T (2014) Quantifying the effect of ribosomal density on mRNA stability. PLoS One 9:e102308
Chan LY, Mugler CF, Heinrich S, Vallotton P, Weis K (2018) Non-invasive measurement of mRNA decay reveals translation initiation as the major determinant of mRNA stability. Elife 7:e32536. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32536
Neymotin B, Ettorre V, Gresham D (2016) Multiple Transcript Properties Related to Translation Affect mRNA Degradation Rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda) 6(11):3475-3483. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.032276
Purvis IJ et al (1987) The efficiency of folding of some proteins is increased by controlled rates of translation in vivo. A hypothesis. J Mol Biol 193(2):413–417
Thanaraj TA, Argos P (1996a) Ribosome-mediated translational pause and protein domain organization. Protein Sci 5(8):1594–1612
Thanaraj TA, Argos P (1996b) Protein secondary structural types are differentially coded on messenger RNA. Protein Sci 5(10):1973–1983
Krasheninnikov IA, Komar AA, Adzhubei IA (1991) Nonuniform size distribution of nascent globin peptides, evidence for pause localization sites, and a contranslational protein-folding model. J Protein Chem 10(5):445–453
Chartier M, Gaudreault F, Najmanovich R (2012) Large-scale analysis of conserved rare codon clusters suggests an involvement in co-translational molecular recognition events. Bioinformatics 28(11):1438–1445. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts149
Fluman N, Navon S, Bibi E, Pilpel Y (2014) mRNA-programmed translation pauses in the targeting of E. coli membrane proteins. Elife 3:e03440. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03440
Bitran A et al (2020) Cotranslational folding allows misfolding-prone proteins to circumvent deep kinetic traps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117(3):1485–1495
Zhao F, Yu CH, Liu Y (2017) Codon usage regulates protein structure and function by affecting translation elongation speed in Drosophila cells. Nucleic Acids Res 45(14):8484–8492
Oresic M, Shalloway D (1998) Specific correlations between relative synonymous codon usage and protein secondary structure. J Mol Biol 281(1):31–48
Adzhubei IA, Adzhubei AA, Neidle S (1998) An Integrated Sequence-Structure Database incorporating matching mRNA sequence, amino acid sequence and protein three-dimensional structure data. Nucleic Acids Res 26(1):327–331
Smith DW (1996) Problems of translating heterologous genes in expression systems: the role of tRNA. Biotechnol Prog 12(4):417–422
Kurland C, Gallant J (1996) Errors of heterologous protein expression. Curr Opin Biotechnol 7(5):489–493
Komar AA, Jaenicke R (1995) Kinetics of translation of gamma B crystallin and its circularly permutated variant in an in vitro cell-free system: possible relations to codon distribution and protein folding. FEBS Lett 376(3):195–198
Komar AA, Lesnik T, Reiss C (1999) Synonymous codon substitutions affect ribosome traffic and protein folding during in vitro translation. FEBS Lett 462(3):387–391
Spencer PS et al (2012) Silent substitutions predictably alter translation elongation rates and protein folding efficiencies. J Mol Biol 422(3):328–335
Zhang G, Hubalewska M, Ignatova Z (2009) Transient ribosomal attenuation coordinates protein synthesis and co-translational folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16(3):274–280
Zhou M et al (2015) Nonoptimal codon usage influences protein structure in intrinsically disordered regions. Mol Microbiol 97(5):974–987
Buhr F et al (2016) Synonymous codons direct cotranslational folding toward different protein conformations. Mol Cell 61(3):341–351
Yang JR, Chen X, Zhang J (2014) Codon-by-codon modulation of translational speed and accuracy via mRNA folding. PLoS Biol. 12(7):e1001910
Faure G et al (2016) Role of mRNA structure in the control of protein folding. Nucleic Acids Res 44(22):10898–10911
Sharp PM et al (2005) Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 33(4):1141–1153
Saibil H (2013) Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14(10):630–642
Xia X (1996) Maximizing transcription efficiency causes codon usage bias. Genetics 144:1309–1320
Cohen E, Zafrir Z, Tuller T (2018) A code for transcription elongation speed. RNA Biol 15(1):81–94
Kudla G et al (2006) High guanine and cytosine content increases mRNA levels in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol 4(6):e180
Newman ZR et al (2016) Differences in codon bias and GC content contribute to the balanced expression of TLR7 and TLR9. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(10):E1362–E1371
Mordstein C et al (2020) Codon usage and splicing jointly influence mRNA localization. Cell Syst 10(4):351-362 e8
Fontrodona N et al (2019) Interplay between coding and exonic splicing regulatory sequences. Genome Res 29(5):711–722
Stergachis AB et al (2013) Exonic transcription factor binding directs codon choice and affects protein evolution. Science 342(6164):1367–1372
Crick FH (1966) Codon–anticodon pairing: the wobble hypothesis. J Mol Biol 19(2):548–555
Roth AC (2012) Decoding properties of tRNA leave a detectable signal in codon usage bias. Bioinformatics 28(18):i340–i348
Gromadski KB, Daviter T, Rodnina MV (2006) A uniform response to mismatches in codon-anticodon complexes ensures ribosomal fidelity. Mol Cell 21(3):369–377
Stadler M, Fire A (2011) Wobble base-pairing slows in vivo translation elongation in metazoans. RNA 17(12):2063–2073
Dedon PC, Begley TJ (2014) A system of RNA modifications and biased codon use controls cellular stress response at the level of translation. Chem Res Toxicol 27(3):330–337
Boccaletto P et al (2018) MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D303–D307
Deng W et al (2015) Trm9-catalyzed tRNA modifications regulate global protein expression by codon-biased translation. PLoS Genet 11(12):e1005706
Jaroensuk J et al (2016) Methylation at position 32 of tRNA catalyzed by TrmJ alters oxidative stress response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nucleic Acids Res 44(22):10834–10848
Gu C, Begley TJ, Dedon PC (2014) tRNA modifications regulate translation during cellular stress. FEBS Lett 588(23):4287–4296
Chan CT et al (2012) Reprogramming of tRNA modifications controls the oxidative stress response by codon-biased translation of proteins. Nat Commun 3:937
Chionh YH et al (2016) tRNA-mediated codon-biased translation in mycobacterial hypoxic persistence. Nat Commun 7:13302
Nedialkova DD, Leidel SA (2015) Optimization of codon translation rates via tRNA modifications maintains proteome integrity. Cell 161(7):1606–1618
Bornelöv S et al (2019) Codon usage optimization in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1726-z
Arango D et al (2018) Acetylation of cytidine in mRNA promotes translation efficiency. Cell 175(7):1872-1886.e24
Eyler DE et al (2019) Pseudouridinylation of mRNA coding sequences alters translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 116(46):23068–23074
Mao Y et al (2019) m(6)A in mRNA coding regions promotes translation via the RNA helicase-containing YTHDC2. Nat Commun 10(1):5332
Liu Z, Zhang J (2018) Most m6A RNA modifications in protein-coding regions are evolutionarily unconserved and likely nonfunctional. Mol Biol Evol. 35(3):666–675
Ditttmar KA et al (2005) Selective charging of tRNA isoacceptors induced by amino-acid starvation. EMBO Rep 6(2):151–157
Gingold H, Dahan O, Pilpel Y (2012) Dynamic changes in translational efficiency are deduced from codon usage of the transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res 40:10053–10063
Torrent M et al (2018) Cells alter their tRNA abundance to selectively regulate protein synthesis during stress conditions. Sci Signal
Frenkel-Morgenstern M et al (2012) Genes adopt non-optimal codon usage to generate cell cycle-dependent oscillations in protein levels. Mol Syst Biol 8:572
Sabi R, Tuller T (2019) Novel insights into gene expression regulation during meiosis revealed by translation elongation dynamics. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 5:12
Goodenpour JM, Pan T (2006) Diversity of tRNA genes in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 34:6137–6146
Kutter C et al (2011) Pol III binding in six mammalian genomes shows high conservation among amino acid isotypes, despite divergence in tRNA gene usage. Nat Genet. 43(10):948–955
Geslain R, Pan T (2010) Functional analysis of human tRNA isodecoders. J Mol Biol 396(3):821
Zhou M et al (2013) Non-optimal codon usage affects expression, structure and function of clock protein FRQ. Nature 495:111–115
Xu Y et al (2013) Non-optimal codon usage is a mechanism to achieve circadian clock conditionality. Nature 495:116–120
Saikia M et al (2016) Codon optimality controls differential mRNA translation during amino acid starvation. RNA 22:1719–1727
Guimaraes JC et al (2020) A rare codon-based translational program of cell proliferation. Genome Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-1943-5
Burrow DA et al (2018) Attenuated codon optimality contributes to neural-specific mRNA decay in Drosophila. Cell Rep 24(7):1704–1712
Begley TJ et al (2004) Hot spots for modulating toxicity identified by genomic phenotyping and localization mapping. Mol Cell 16(1):117–125
Bennett CB et al (2001) Genes required for ionizing radiation resistance in yeast. Nat Genet 29(4):426–434
Kalhor HR, Clarke S (2003) Novel methyltransferase for modified uridine residues at the wobble position of tRNA. Mol Cell Biol 23(24):9283–9292
Begley U et al (2007) Trm9-catalyzed tRNA modifications link translation to the DNA damage response. Mol Cell 28(5):860–870
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all members of our laboratory for discussions. This work is supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP18H05278 and 20F20115, and Takeda Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hia, F., Takeuchi, O. The effects of codon bias and optimality on mRNA and protein regulation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 1909–1928 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03685-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03685-7