| Budget Amount *help |
¥1,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000)
Fiscal Year 1990: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 1989: ¥600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000)
|
|---|
| Research Abstract |
In software prototyping, there exists a cycle named prototyping cycle, which has 3 phases, i. e., prototype building, execution and evaluation phases. Software designers should perform prototyping activity around the cycle as fast as possible in order to validate, modify and refine requirements and design. In complex concurrent software, the visual inspection is not enough to examine the behavior of the prototype. In order to prompt the rapidness of prototyping, more effective tools should be provided at the prototype evaluation phase for the examination of the prototype behavior. This research studies the effective tools on the basis on diagnosis type of expert systems. These tools can detects the bottleneck and the deadlock and provide improvement plans for avoiding their sources. Deadlock is the fatal effect of function of concurrent software systems. Bottleneck is the fatal effect of performance of concurrent software systems. Expert system for deadlock is based on the linear integer programming for obtaining firing sequences by which the system falls into the deadlock state. Expert system for bottleneck is based on the qualitative reasoning for improving bottlenecks. This research also studies the complementary role of heuristic diagnosis method on the basis of expert system and the analytical diagnosis method on the basis of algorithm, and the complementary role of qualitative diagnosis and quantitative diagnosis.
|
