| Project/Area Number |
02451001
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Research Field |
Philosophy
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Chiba University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
IIDA Takashi Chiba University, Faculty of Letters, Professor, 文学部, 教授 (10117327)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
TUTIYA Syun Chiba University, Faculty of Letters, Assistant Professor, 文学部, 助教授 (50155404)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
1990 – 1992
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 1992)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,400,000)
Fiscal Year 1992: ¥700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000)
Fiscal Year 1991: ¥1,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000)
Fiscal Year 1990: ¥1,700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Japanese semantics / Logical semantics / Philosophy of language |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The aim of our research was to re-examine the traditional philosophical concepts in the light of the investigation of the logico-semantical aspects of Japanese. Towards that end, we used the methods that have been developed in formal semantics. The main results of our research are as follows:
1. In philosophical tradition, the studies of a natural language have been conducted under an influential trichotomy, which is constituted by syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Our research of Japanese semantics has made it clear that this trichotomy is not appropriate to explain various semantical phenomena.
2. However, we must admit that we do not have a framework alternative to the traditional trichotomy. We have made some suggestions about how to mark the new boundary between semantics and pragmatics.
3. We suggested that the study of certain class of Japanese adjectives can shed light towards the traditional epistemological problems, especially the problem of other minds.
4. We investigated the Japanese expressions for quantification and made some suggestions as to the relation between a semantics of such expressions and the ontological problems, especially the problem of "ontological commitments".
|
