| Project/Area Number |
03301066
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Co-operative Research (A)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Research Field |
Civil law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | HOSEI UNIVERSITY |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
SUNAGA Jun HOSEI UNIVERSITY, Faculty of Law, Professor., 法学部, 教授 (70061059)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
HARUTA Kazuo KYUSHU International UNIVERSITY, Faculty of Law and Economics, Dean., 法経学部, 学部長 (80140820)
HISHIKI Shohachiro SENSYU UNIVERSITY, Faculty of Law, Professor., 法学部, 教授 (30083546)
ARAI Makoto KOKUGAKUIN UNIVERSITY, Faculty of Law, Professor., 法学部, 教授 (40146741)
KOBAYASHI Hidefumi CHUKYO UNIVERSITY, Faculty of Law, Professor., 法学部, 教授 (20121395)
KOBAYASHI Kazutoshi ASIA UNIVERSITY, Faculty of Law, Professor., 法学部, 教授 (20050205)
奥山 恭子 帝京大学, 文学部, 助教授 (50214086)
前田 泰 徳島大学, 總合科学部, 助教授 (40209391)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
1991 – 1992
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 1992)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥1,800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,800,000)
Fiscal Year 1992: ¥800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000)
Fiscal Year 1991: ¥1,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | incapacity / incapacitated person / tutor / curator / enduring power of attorney / durable power of attorney / 後見 / 保佐 / 禁冶産 / 無能力制度 / 禁治産者 / 準禁治産者 / 後見・保佐 / 持続的代理権 / 成年者世話法 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The japanese Civil Code came into force in 1898. And since then its reform was only twice performed (1947, 1979). But recently in many European countries (France, Germany et c.) was performed the big reform of the laws of incapacity and the japanese law of incapacity is nowadays out of date. Therefore in Japan the reform is inevitable in following points.
1. In Japan there are only 2 types of incapacity for the adults. That system is too narrow and rigid to deal with the variety of mental or physical disability.
2. According to the present japanese law we cannot protect the physically disabled persons, because we have only incapacity due to the mental disability.
3. Incapacitation is not always profitable for the disabled persons. Therefore it is necessary to elaborate the system for the protection of disabled persons without incapacitation in addition to the present system.
4. Nowadays the family court does not take the initiative in making the system begin to work. But the role of the State must be greater and graver.
|
