• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

A Study of the multilitigation in the Japanese civile procedure -Real party in the interest, joinder of Parties, res judicata and due proces of law-

Research Project

Project/Area Number 06620036
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Research Field Civil law
Research InstitutionKaogoshima University

Principal Investigator

SANO Hiroyuki  Kagoshima University, Faculty of Law Economics and Humanities, Associate Professor, 法文学部, 助教授 (10145451)

Project Period (FY) 1994 – 1995
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 1995)
Budget Amount *help
¥1,800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,800,000)
Fiscal Year 1995: ¥700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000)
Fiscal Year 1994: ¥1,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000)
KeywordsMultiparty litigation / Real party in the interest / Joinder of parties / Due Process of law / Res judicata / Necessary party / Indispensable party / Intervention / 当事者適格 / 判決効の拡張
Research Abstract

The Japanese civile procedure hat so many types of multiparty-litigation. For exsample, there are necessary party (hituyoteki-kyodososho) and indispensable party (koyu-hituyoteki-kyodososyo) in the joinder of parties (kyodososho, (section)(section)59-63 in the rules of japanese civile procedure), and in the intervention there are hojosanka (and kyoudososhoteki-hojosanka, (section)(section)64-70), dokuritu-tojisha-sanka ((section)(section)71-74, like as Inerpleader and Impleader), kyodo-sosho-sanka ((section)75) and sosho-kokuchi ((section)(section)76-78, like as compulsory joinder).
This resarch deals with these institutions especially between to the actual dispute. We are accustomed to use the japanese civi multiparty system in the view of two-parties-dispute-resolution, so that the function of Multilitigation-System is fullwidthy reduced, especially in the japanese judicial cases. In this article, I have drawed the conclusion from the resarch for several judicial cases, that multiparty litigation system hat to be used not by analogy with two-parties-system, but in the relationship to the real dispute.

Report

(3 results)
  • 1995 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report Summary
  • 1994 Annual Research Report
  • Research Products

    (7 results)

All Other

All Publications (7 results)

  • [Publications] 佐野裕志: "高等裁判所が判決の形式でした補助参加の許否に関する裁判に対する上告と最高裁判所の審理の対象" 判例評論. 441. 70-74 (1995)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      1995 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 佐野裕志: "§231二重起訴の禁止" 注釈民事訴訟法. 5. (1996)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      1995 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Hiroyuki SANO: "Case notes on Civil Case of the Japanese Supreme Court" HANREI HYORON. Vol.441. 70 (1995)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      1995 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Hiroyuki SANO: "Comment on (section)231 in the rules of japanese civil procedure" CHUSHAKU-MINJISOSHOHO. 5, (scheduled). (1996)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      1995 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 佐野裕志: "高等裁判所が判決の形式でした補助参加の許否に関する判決に対する上告と最高裁判所の審理の対象" 判例評論. 441. 70-74 (1995)

    • Related Report
      1995 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 佐野裕志: "§231〔二重起訴の禁止〕" 注釈民事訴訟法. 5. (1996)

    • Related Report
      1995 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 佐野裕志: "独立当事者参加の要件としての合一確定の必要性" ジュリスト臨時増刊『平成六年度重要判例解説』. (1995)

    • Related Report
      1994 Annual Research Report

URL: 

Published: 1994-04-01   Modified: 2016-04-21  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi