| Project/Area Number |
07302003
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
International law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
DOGAUCHI Masato University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Law and Politics, Professor, 大学院・法学政治学研究科, 教授 (70114577)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
NAKANO Shunichiro Kobe University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (30180326)
SAITO Akira Kansai University, Faculty of Law, Associate Professor, 法学部, 助教授 (80205632)
KONO Toshiyuki Kyushu University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (80186626)
KUNITOMO Akihiko Osaka City University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (20178015)
AOKI Kiyoshi Nanzan University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (80159277)
NEMOTO Yoichi Yokohama National University, Faculty of Economics, Associate Professor, 経済学部, 助教授 (60198570)
DEGUCHI Koji Sophia University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (30180102)
SANO Hiroshi Okayama University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (40135281)
OKUDA Yasuhiro Hokkaido University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (20135776)
NOMURA Yoshiaki Osaka University, Graduate School of Public Policies, Professor, 大学院・国際公共政策研究科, 教授 (20144420)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
1995 – 1997
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 1997)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥5,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥5,400,000)
Fiscal Year 1997: ¥600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000)
Fiscal Year 1996: ¥1,700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,700,000)
Fiscal Year 1995: ¥3,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,100,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Contract / Tort / Legislation / Private International Law / Governing Law / Acency / Applicable Law / Conflict of Laws |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
considering that the present rules of private international law in Japan cannot deal with modern and complex transnational legal problem properly, this Study group investigated the new rules, especially on contractual and nono-contractual obligations which are very important in international trade. Our conclusions are as follows : With regard to the contractual obligations, the scope of party automony should be calarified ; In the absence of choice of law by the parties, "characteristic performance test" should be adopted in the definite forms : Mandatory rules of the country which has the most significant interest in the protection of weaker parties shold be applied in certain types of contracts ; Torts should be divided into some categories and governing law should be selected in each category ; Law applicable to agencey, assignment of claims, set-off, Actio Oblique and Actio Pauliana should be spelled out.
|
