• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Comparative Study of the Political Thoughts of Modern Neo-Confucianists

Research Project

Project/Area Number 07620054
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Section一般
Research Field Politics
Research InstitutionThe University of Tokyo

Principal Investigator

WATANABE Hiroshi  The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Law and Poltics, Professor, 大学院・法学政治学研究科, 教授 (10009821)

Project Period (FY) 1995 – 1996
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 1996)
Budget Amount *help
¥1,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000)
Fiscal Year 1996: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 1995: ¥900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000)
KeywordsModern Neo-Confuciansm / political thought
Research Abstract

So-called Modern Neo-Confuciansts are the 20th-century Chinese thinkers who believed Confucianism even after the iconoclastic May Fourth Movement, while learning from western thoughts and philosophies. Chinese intellectuals both in and out of the mainland have immense interests in them especilly since the 1980s. But studies on them are still minimal in Japan. Thererfore, the first step of this research was to collect related materials as many as possible and analyze them. The second step was to pick out the Modern Neo-Confucinists who asserted the affinity of Confucinism with modern western political thoughts such as Mou Zongsan and Xu Fuguan and compare them with Japanese thinkers who also believed in it such as Yokoi Shonan, Sakatani Roro and Nakae Chomin.
The tentative conclusions of this research is as follows. First, the importance of Modern Neo-Confucinists is undeniable, although they are somtimes severely criticized by other Chinese intellectuals. They had many interesting ideas and their influence is strong. Second, some Modern Neo-Confuciansts and the above-mentioned Japanese thinkers have striking similarity in some aspects. (For instance, they even quote exactly the same passage of Confucian classics to prove their similar point.) But, in another sense, they are almost opposite. The former emphasized the aftinity of Confucinaism with modernity in order to defend Confunianism, while the latter asserted it to justify modernization. Third, Confucianism is really multifaceted. It is not a mere ideology for conservatism and despotism as is often believed.

Report

(3 results)
  • 1996 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report Summary
  • 1995 Annual Research Report

URL: 

Published: 1995-04-01   Modified: 2016-04-21  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi