| Project/Area Number |
09420007
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
International law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kyoto Human Rights Research Institute |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
TABATA Shigejiro Kyoto Human Rights Research Institute, Director, 所長 (00280678)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
HONMA Hiroshi Surugadai University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (30209340)
KIM Donghoon Ryukoku University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (20067911)
ANDO Nisuke Doshisha University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (20026777)
YAKUSHIJI Kimio Ritsumeikan University, Faculty of Law, Professor, 法学部, 教授 (50144613)
NISHII Masahiro Kyoto University, Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Professor, 大学院・人間・環境学研究科, 教授 (60025161)
竹本 正幸 関西大学, 法学部, 教授 (60067535)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
1997 – 1999
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 1999)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥10,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥10,600,000)
Fiscal Year 1999: ¥3,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,200,000)
Fiscal Year 1998: ¥3,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,200,000)
Fiscal Year 1997: ¥4,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,200,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | protection of human rights / the International Covenants on Human Rights / the ICCPR / the Human Rights Committee / State Reporting Procedure / Individual communication procedure |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
During the period of research funding for this study, we have considered state reporting investigations form 29 State Parties, and 11 articles of the ICCPR and 5 issues, including local remedy definition of victims, of admissibility in the individual communication procedure. Until now, we have studied nearly 50 state reports from all parts of the world and almost two thirds of the articles in the ICCPR.We greatly thank research funding system for helping this study. This research would not have been possible without this Aid.
Our study clarifies the situation of human rights all over the world. And it explains the status of international law under constitutional systems, how to implement the ICCPR and the gap between national law and the obligation of the ICCPR.Further, we hope that this study can greatly contribute to the interpretation of the ICCPR in the Japanese judicial system.
This report includes the following as follows, which we have extensively discussed in our seminars : (1) t
… More
he Obligations of Article 6 of ICCPR, (2) the rights to one's own country-Article 12 (4) of ICCPR, (3) Procedural Guarantees Against Expulsion of Foreigners-Analysis on Communications relating to Article 13 of ICCPR -, (4) Analytical Studies of Art. 14 (3) (d) of ICCPR, Recent Cases on the Freedom of Expression ; (5) The Functions of the Human Rights Committee in Considering the States Parties' Reports - The Examination of the Preparatory Works-, (6) Consideration to some questions about the application of ICCPR in Islamic States, (7) Consideration of Austrian Reports by the Human Rights Committee under ICCPR ; (8) On the views of Human Rights Committee in relation to the concept of "victims", (9) On the first case in which Human Rights Committee considered the Trinidad and Tobago's reservation invalid ; (10) Feminism Emerging International Law : The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women ; (11) The role of national human rights institutions in the national implementation of international human rights law. Less
|
