| Project/Area Number |
09610424
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
国語学
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Toyama University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KOSUKEGAWA Teiji TOYAMA Univ., Faculty of Humanities, Prof., 人文学部, 教授 (20201486)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
1997 – 2000
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2001)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥1,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥200,000)
Fiscal Year 1999: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 1998: ¥400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥400,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Wen-hsuan(**) / manuscripts of Wen-hsuan(**) / diacritical materials of Wen-hsuan(**) / Wen-hsuan-ji-zhu(****) / Kundoku method(****) / how Wen-hsuan(**) was accepted in Japan / contrastive table of early manuscripts of Wen-hsuan(**) / 九条本文選 / 五臣注文選 / 五臣注本文選 / 上野本漢書楊雄伝 / 電子化テキスト / 高山寺方式 / 書陵部本文選 / JIS外漢字 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Wen-hsuan(**) is well known as a book which greatly influenced the academic culture in ancient Japan. However, when we actually refer this reputation to the manuscripts which exist in Japan, we see that this reputation is not exactly true both in quality and in quantity. I succeeded in clarifying the following points through this study;
1. The number of manuscripts which still exist in presenet are few, and their volumes are uneven.
2. How each annotator used the commentary when copying the manuscripts is not uniform and differs in level; some used profoundly but others only superficially.
3. The articles those have recorded how Wen-hsuan(**) was accepted in Japan need to be re-examined.
4. The hypothesis that there existed Kundoku(**) in Wen-hsuan(**) of Nara(**) era should be discussed with much more caution.
|
