| Project/Area Number |
10610514
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
言語学・音声学
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Osaka University of Foreign Studies |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
UEDA Isao Osaka University of Foreign Studies, Faculty of Foreign Studies Associate Professor, 外国語学部, 助教授 (50176583)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
1998 – 2000
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2000)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,100,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 1999: ¥600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000)
Fiscal Year 1998: ¥1,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | speech lisorder / phonology / phonological acquisition / rhotics / Optimality Theory / constraint / 音韻獲得 / 構音障害 / 音韻障害 / 音置換 / 機能的構音障害 / ら行音 / 素性不完全指定理論 / 素性階層論 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Although the acquisition of Japanese 'r' poses many problems and the early substitution of other phonemes for 'r, ' a very common type of functional speech disorder termed 'rhotacism, ' is notably well-known in Japanese first language acquisition, it has seldom been a subject matter for phonological analysis. In this research I first cast light on the two representative types of rhotacism by observing some descriptive acquisitional data. I then point out theoretical deficits of a previous derivation-based account and go on to reanalyze the data under Optimality Theory. It has become evident that the different stages in the acquisition of Japanese 'r' is a result of a different ranking of three constraints at each stage before the adult-like ranking of the fully-developed phonological system is acquired. Moreover, the distinction between the two representative types of rhotacism in acquisition can be reduced to the difference in ranking. In optimality-theoretic terms, the acquisition of 'r' is characterized as the promotion of a faithfulness constraint, but the way the promotion occurs is different in the two types of rhotacism.
|
