Budget Amount *help |
¥3,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,600,000)
Fiscal Year 1999: ¥900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000)
Fiscal Year 1998: ¥2,700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,700,000)
|
Research Abstract |
In this studies we examined to determine the site of suppressive action of adenosine to morphine-tolerance by using intracerebral micro-injection technique. Centrally administered adenosine depressed morphine-induced analgesia via adenosine A1 receptor and theophylline and/or specific A1 receptor antagonists were able to suppressed the development of morphine-induced tolerance. In native rats, the micro-injections of morphine into the nucleus reticulates gigantocellularis (NRGC)/the nucleus reticularis paragigantocellularis (NRPG) and the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), produced significant elevation of pain threshold. These effects were suppressed with simultaneous treatment of N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA), a specific A1 agonist. When micro-injected into the NRGC/NRPG and/or PAG, N-acetyl- β -endorphin(1-27)(NABE) also suppressed morphine-induced analgesia. The suppressive effects of CHA and NABE were reversed with simultaneous treatment of 8-cyclopentytheophylline (CPT), a specific A1 antagonist. In morphine-tolerant rats, a single micro-injection of morphine into the NRGC/NRPG and PAG, no longer produced an increase in pain threshold. However, analgesic effect of morphine were recovered with simultaneous treatment of morphine and CPT into the NRGC/NRPG and PAG. These results suggest that central adenosine system plays an important role in the formation of morphine-induced tolerance. On the other hand, in morphine-dependent rat, naloxone-induced abstinence signs were suppressed by intracerebroventricular (I. C. v.) injections of CHA and/or CGS21680, a specific A2 receptor agonist. Therefore, in the morphine-dependent condition, central adenosine may play a role in the suppression of morphine-withdrawal signs via A1 and A2 receptors.
|