Project/Area Number |
11301004
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
教育・社会系心理学
|
Research Institution | KYUSHU UNIVERSITY |
Principal Investigator |
MARUNO Shunichi FACULTY OF HUMAN-ENVIRONMENT STUDIES, PROFESSOR, 大学院・人間環境学研究院, 教授 (30101009)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
KARIYAZONO Akihiko KAGOSIMA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, 教育学部, 助教授 (30274674)
TAJIKA Hidetugu AITI-EDUCATIONAL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION, PROFESSOR, 教育学部, 教授 (30109368)
KATO Kazuo KYUSHU UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HUMAN-ENVIRONMENT STUDIES, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, 大学院・人間環境学研究院, 助教授 (00281759)
WATAMAKI Toru SIEBOLD UNIVERSITY OF NAGASAKI, FACULTY OF THE SCIENCE OF NURSING, PROFESSOR, 看護学部, 教授 (70142172)
DEGUTI Takeshi YAMAGATA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, 教育学部, 助教授 (60241684)
赤松 信彦 上越教育大学, 学校教育学部, 講師 (30281736)
藤田 豊 熊本大学, 教育学部, 助教授 (60238590)
|
Project Period (FY) |
1999 – 2001
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2001)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥37,640,000 (Direct Cost: ¥35,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥2,640,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥11,440,000 (Direct Cost: ¥8,800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥2,640,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥10,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥10,200,000)
Fiscal Year 1999: ¥16,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥16,000,000)
|
Keywords | Discussion Process / Implicit rules / Discussion Skill / Reflective thinking activites / Metacognitive expressions / Abilities of self-expression / 自己表現力 / 自己反省的思考活動 / ディスカッションの展開位相 / 個人内ゾーン / 曖昧性の認識 / 状況モニタリング / ディスカッション体験の欠如 / 創造的な演習 / 議論能力の育成 / 対話型授業 / 自己反省的思考 / 批判的・創造的思考 / 対人関係技能の開発 / コンピューターネツトワーク状況での討論 |
Research Abstract |
We conducted studies theoretically and empirically on the following three topics : 1. Analysis of discussion phases and metacognitive expressions : We quantitatively and qualitatively investigated the effects of goals, arrangement of group members, and members' characteristics on the unfolding process and content of discussions and proposed a model for the unfolding process of discussions. This proposed model describes the reflective thinking activities that proceed zigzag in the three phases differently. Namely, during the first phase, reflective thinking activities take place in the zone of social collaboration structures ; in the second, they take place in the personal zone ; and, in the third, they take place by going between the above two zones ; and in each phase, metacognitive expressions play mediating functions. 2. Analysis of "Implicit rules" that inhibit creative discussions : Why can't children and students ask questions in classrooms more spontaneously? We assumed that one
… More
of the reasons is the existence of "bad" implicit rules that prevail deeply in classrooms. Based upon this assumption, we conducted a systematic survey study and statistically extracted the factors underlying "implicit rules." The findings suggest (1) that there are two types of implicit rules, ones specific to certain age groups and ones non-specific to age, (2) to what extent and how the teacher can interact with students so that the negative pressure of implicit rules could be alleviated or removed determine whether children and students ask questions spontaneously, whether creative discussions will be achieved where children actively examine and (re-)scrutinize problems, and whether their learning environment will be a more stimulating one which will help children develop positive attitudes toward learning collaboratively. 3. Learning environments that foster the abilities of self-expression and discussion skills : We assumed that the type of dialogues/conversations/discussions that take place among family members, among peers, and at school and their atmosphere where they take place foster children's attitudes and skills essential for expressing oneself spontaneously to, and engaging in creative discussions with, other people with different views and values. Based upon this assumption, we conducted quantitative and qualitative surveys and analyses to test our proposed causal models of how those factors determine actual discussion skills and creative thinking activities in children. Less
|