| Project/Area Number |
11610035
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
倫理学
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Mie University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
TOHYAMA Atsushi Mie University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Associate Professor, 人文学部, 助教授 (70212066)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
MARIKO Ogawa Mie University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Professor, 人文学部, 教授 (00185513)
YAMAOKA Eturo Mie University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Professor, 人文学部, 教授 (90115741)
ITO Sukeyuki Mie University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Professor, 人文学部, 教授 (50011359)
KYUMA Taiken Mie University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Lecturer, 人文学部, 講師 (60324498)
KATAKURA Nozomu Mie University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Professor, 人文学部, 教授 (70194769)
桑原 直己 筑波大学, 哲学思想学系, 助教授 (20178156)
斉藤 明 (斎藤 明) 東京大学, 大学院・人文社会系研究科, 教授 (80170489)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
1999 – 2001
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2001)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥1,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000)
Fiscal Year 1999: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Jo / pathos(passion, Leidenschaft) / moral sense / Ri / logos / logos / Logos / pahos,(passion,Leiderschaft) |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The aim of this research is to elucidate the structure and ethical significance of human being's Jo. After arranging various issues brought up by each of research members, the whole group of them made attempt to come to some more principal understandings of Jo and to consider the ethical significance of this notion. This attempt was fed back again to the individual fields of the members, so that each of them might examine a comprehensive viewpoint concerning the notion of Jo. In conclusion, the following understandings of the subject, as well as some new issues on it, result from the above-mentioned research :
1. In western philosophy, the conflict between Jo and Ri is generally regarded as origination in Platonism. According to Plat himself, however, both are derived from the nature of soul, which tends to restore what wants in itself. In that sense, Stoic and Kantianistic standpoints should also be re-examined from the viewpoint of human 'nature' (physis).
2. Appreciating human active emotions, the movement of Kogaku in modern Japan criticized Ri of Sogaku as an obsolete word or an argumentative thing. however, it does not mean the entire rejection of Ri of Sogaku that nothing but Shitan based on human emotions can establish the truth of human co-operation and that the comprehension of the truth of existence is possible only by the emotion named aware. All these facts suggest the radical reflections on the relationship between Jo and Ri or Chi in eastern thought.
3. As seen in 1. and 2., accompanied with the understanding that human being should be defined as active or limited existence, the attention to Jo provokes fundamental reflections on the static or unlimited truth and the cognition or judgment of it.
|
