Research Abstract |
In 1999 and 2000 the morphological norms of preterites, imperatives and subjunctives of Ruthenian verbs were analyzed. Although the multiplicity of verbal forms is characteristic in Lithuanian-Byelorussian Chronicles, every manuscript shows its own degree of multiplicity. Nevertheless, it is clear that the unification of the type of personal endings was liquidating the opposition between two basic subtypes of past tense (aorist v. imperfect), hence the differentiation of aspects (perfective v. imperfective) in stem forms were being standarised. It is also proved by the description of Church Slavic grammars. As for the mood, especially subjunctive, on the other hand, the complicated system of formation is hardly found in the texts of chronicles. In 2001 the main concern of research was focused on the case endings with reference to the legal texts. Consequently, the stability of morphological norms of nouns were observed.
|