The Open-Door Policy and the Change of Regional Unity in North Vietnam
Project/Area Number |
11691065
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 海外学術 |
Research Field |
広領域
|
Research Institution | The University of Tokyo |
Principal Investigator |
FURUTA Motoo The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Professor, 大学院・総合文化研究科, 教授 (50114632)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
TAKEUCHI Ikuo Tokyo University of Agricultuer & Technology, Graduate School of Agricultuer, Associate Professor, 大学院・農学研究科, 助教授 (90313288)
SHIRAISHI Masaya Waseda University, Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Professor, アジア太平洋研究センター, 教授 (70127330)
KURIHARA Hirohide Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Research Institute for Languages & Cultures of Asia & Africa, Associate Professor, アジア・アフリカ言語文化研究所, 助教授 (30195557)
ITO Masako Daito Bunka University, Faculty of International Relations, Lecturer, 国際関係学部, 講師 (20327993)
IWATSUKI Junichi Hitotsubashi University, Graduate School of Language and Society, Lecturer, 大学院・言語社会研究科, 講師 (80313162)
|
Project Period (FY) |
1999 – 2001
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2001)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥24,860,000 (Direct Cost: ¥23,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,860,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥8,060,000 (Direct Cost: ¥6,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,860,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥8,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥8,200,000)
Fiscal Year 1999: ¥8,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥8,600,000)
|
Keywords | Doi moi(Renovation) / Reform & Open-Door / Market Economy / Socialism / Border Trade / Northern Vietnam / Southern China |
Research Abstract |
The political and economic relations between China and Vietnam have developed dramatically since the Sino-Vietnamese rapprochement in 1991. However, the presence of China along the Vietnamese side of the border area as well as in the northern part of Vietnam is still not so great in spite of its rapid economic growth. We can point out some fectors on that matter through our three years' field research in Vietnam and China : 1) The Chinese people (in Guangxi and Yunnan) are inclined to seek for a transnational economic development while the Vietnamese pay much more attention to the economic development only in the limited area near the border. 2) The Vietnamese side has only a few local government offices to accept planned investment from China. 3) The Chinese local governments have rights to decide their foreign trade policies independently while in Vietnam only the central government can decide every policy related to foreign trade. 4) It took much time (4 to 5 years) for the Vietnamese government to draw out a general policy on the border economic areas, following some experimental policies applied to some of the border areas including Mong Cai, Lang Son, Lao Cai and Cao Bang. Along with the abovementioned situation on the Sino-Vietnamese border area we should also put our mind to its dynamic aspects : In inland areas such as Lai Chau province and Jin Ping county (Yunnan) the officials of the neighboring local governments share in a trans-regional economic development strategy along the Yunnan-Lai Chau-Lao corridor. Although it is not clear how the Vietnamese government would deal with such claims of the local officials but certainly there is still a possibility of the regional reintegration along the Sino-Vietnamese border.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(12 results)