| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
ISHIKAWA Noboru Kyoto Univ. CSEAS Associate Professor, 東南アジア研究センター, 助教授 (50273503)
HAYASHI Yukio Kyoto Univ. CSEAS Associate Professor, 東南アジア研究センター, 助教授 (60208634)
NAGATSU Kazufumi Kyoto U. ASAFAS Research Associate, 大学院・アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科, 助手 (20324676)
SADAYOSHI Yasushi Kobe U. Fac. Of Cross-Cultural Studies Lecturer, 国際文化部, 講師 (20314453)
MINO Yoko (HAYAMI Yoko) Kyoto U. CSEAS Associate Professor, 東南アジア研究センター, 助教授 (60283660)
小瀬木 えりの 大阪国際大学, 経済情報学部, 講師 (00309379)
|
|---|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥22,590,000 (Direct Cost: ¥20,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,890,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥8,190,000 (Direct Cost: ¥6,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,890,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥7,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥7,000,000)
Fiscal Year 1999: ¥7,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥7,400,000)
|
|---|
| Research Abstract |
During the three-year project period, seven Japanese members and two overseas participants were involved in field-based research, centered on their respective field sites. In addition, members were able to extend their research both in time and space, including Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Myanmar and Laos, as well as conducting library research in the U.S. Through this research, we were able to conduct basic research on the historical processes of inter-ethnic relationship and mobility as well as religious dynamics and cultural reconfiguration. By extending our temporal and spatial perspectives, we have been able to include comparative perspectives. At the end of each fiscal year, we met to check on our framework and orientation.
Against the background of the rapid changes in the past three decades, which have been caused by the global fluidity of capital, people, and culture, it is no longer possible to work solely from the perspective of a nation state. With this in mind, we have looked across national boundaries with the key concepts of inter-ethnic relationship, mobility and cultural reconfiguration, so as to better understand the processes of change in a multi-ethnic and multi-religious region. By so doing we have been able to re-position each our own previously held understanding of local issues, to a larger systematic understanding of social, political and economic changes. By mutual interchange of ideas, each of us was able to depict the inter-ethnic relationship in the construction of nation state, and further realize and depict that by factors such as religion and introduction of globalized economy, such dynamics cannot be understood within a singular nation state framework.
|
