• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Scope of trial examination of suit against patent trial decision and Propriety of argument against invalidation in patent infringement litigation

Research Project

Project/Area Number 12572008
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Section海外学術
Research Field Civil law
Research InstitutionThe University of Tokyo

Principal Investigator

OBUCHI Tetsuya  The University of Tokyo, Graduate School for Law and Politic Science, 大学院・法学政治学研究科, 教授 (30322035)

Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) SUMIKURA Kouichi  National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, Policy Studies, 政策研究科, 助教授 (80302793)
TAMAI Katsuya  The University of Tokyo, Research Center for advanced Science and Technology, 先端科学技術研究センター, 教授 (20163660)
KNELLER Robert  The University of Tokyo, Research Center for advanced Science and Technology, 先端科学技術研究センター, 教授 (20302797)
相田 義明  特許庁, 審判部, 審判官(研究職)
Project Period (FY) 2000 – 2003
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2003)
Budget Amount *help
¥11,700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥11,700,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥2,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,600,000)
Fiscal Year 2002: ¥2,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,600,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥3,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,000,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥3,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000)
KeywordsPatent trial decision / Patent / Scope of examination of litigation / Claim amendments / Trial for connection / Invalidation of a patent / Argument against an validation of a patent / Correction of a claim / 特許争訟 / 特許審決取消訴訟 / 訴訟物 / 主張制限 / 公知技術の抗弁 / ギルビー最判 / 特許侵害訴訟
Research Abstract

As regards actions against patent trial decision, Obuchi will soon complete his second writing entitled "Claim Amendments and Actions against Patent Trial Decisions" (Kohbunndou) that follows his first writing "On Fundamental Structure of a Suit against Patent Trial Decision" (January 2003, Yuhikaku) which is a compilation of basic studies on this subject. In preparation for his second writing Obuebi conducted additional researches (especially, on foreign legislations) which were just as minute as new researches, and the information obtained from literature and noted foreign lawyers and legal scholars whom he met abroad is of great help to him. In the extensive revisions of the Patent Law (concerning trials and litigation) done in 2002, Obuchi took the leadership as a chairman of Industrial Structure Council-Intellectual Property Committee -Dispute Settlement Subcommittee from the scholarly or theoretical point of view, in particular. In acquiring academic knowledge concerning comparat … More ive laws necessary for his role, too, the results of his research conducted on this grant (as research expenses) are very important.
Next, regarding the relationships between patent infringement suit and invalidation of a patent, Obuchi is doing a basic research study as a preliminary to investigations overseas. In view of this, it is respectfully requested that the grant be awarded for research expenses (to carry out academic research in foreign countries) in the coming and subsequent years. Obuchi has an intention of publishing the results of his research as a monograph after conducting a full-scale investigation overseas. (He is planning to visit the United States in the coming year). This subject is now the most important issue in the intellectual property law from the theoretical and practical points of view. Obuchi chaired Office for Promotion of Justice System Reform ・Consultation Group on Intellectual Property Litigation ・Foreign legislation study group and had charge of studies of foreign legislation, focusing on German and European laws. Based on the results of studies in Office for Promotion of Justice System Reform ・Consultation Group on intellectual Property Litigation ・Foreign legislation study group (which were compiled into the book entitled "International Comparison of Intellectual Property Litigation Systems" mentioned below), two legislative bills for The Law concerning Establishment of Intellectual Property High Covet and for an amendment to the court law were drawn up as bills associated with Bills Related to Justice System Reform and decided by the Cabinet on March 2, 2004. Thus the studies on foreign legislation are extremely important for the future state of legislation in our country, and fundamental research on the grant is indispensable in this aspect. The above two laws mark a major milestone for the judicial system of our country, and in the future it will be essential to make a thorough study of the relation between patent infringement suit and invalidation of a patent that relates to the basis of the relationships between litigation and (courts) and administrative proceedings (this being the greatest concern to both of academic and industry circles. Again, it is respectfully requested that the grant be granted for expenses of research (in foreign countries) on the three subjects mentioned above ("Studies for rebuilding up an effective legal enforcement system of intellectual property") because of its great importance to both of the academic and business worlds. Obuchi is devoting himself to the studies, wishing to obtain and publish academic or scholarly results as soon as possible. Less

Report

(5 results)
  • 2003 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report Summary
  • 2002 Annual Research Report
  • 2001 Annual Research Report
  • 2000 Annual Research Report
  • Research Products

    (23 results)

All Other

All Publications (23 results)

  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "特許審判・訴訟制度の現状と課題"ジュリスト. 1248号. 52-61 (2003)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2003 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "訂正審決の確定と無効審決取消訴訟の帰趨"別冊ジュリスト 特許判例百選 第3版. 170号. 110-112 (2004)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2003 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "審決取消訴訟の審理範囲"別冊ジュリスト 特許判例百選 第3版. 170号. 106-109 (2004)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2003 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "審決取消訴訟の現状と課題"日本工業所有権法学会年報. 27号. 91-127 (2004)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2003 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 大渕哲也(代表)ほか4名: "知的財産訴訟制度の国際比較"(株)商事法務. 216 (2003)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2003 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Obuchi Tetsuya: "Present State and Problems of litigation against Trial Decisions"Japan Association of Industrial Property Law. Vol.27. 91-127 (2004)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2003 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Obuchi Tetsuya: "Present State and Problems of Patent Thai and Litigation system"Jurist. No.1249. 52-61 (2004)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2003 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Obuchi Tetsuya: "Trend of Trial Decisions for Correction and Litigation against Trial Decision of Invalidation"Jurist. (separate Vol) No.179. 110-112 (2004)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2003 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Obuchi Tetsuya: "Scope of Examination of Litigation against Trial Decision"Jurist. (separate Vol) No.179. 106-109 (2004)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2003 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "審決取消訴訟の現状と課題"日本工業所有権法学会年報. 27号. 91-127 (2004)

    • Related Report
      2003 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "特許審判・訴訟制度の現状と課題"ジュリスト. 1248号. 52-61 (2003)

    • Related Report
      2003 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "訂正審決の確定と無効審決取消訴訟の帰趨"別冊ジュリスト 特許判例百選 第3版. 170号. 110-112 (2004)

    • Related Report
      2003 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "審決取消訴訟の審理範囲"別冊ジュリスト 特許判例百選 第3版. 170号. 106-109 (2004)

    • Related Report
      2003 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕哲也(代表)ほか4名: "知的財産訴訟制度の国際比較"(株)商事法務(本体). 216 (2003)

    • Related Report
      2003 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "知的財産保護のための法システムに関する横断的分析-体系的分析のための基礎的枠組の提示を中心として-"ジュリスト. 1237号. 196-213 (2003)

    • Related Report
      2002 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "特許審判と特許訴訟の諸問題"ジュリスト. 1227号. 33-39 (2002)

    • Related Report
      2002 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "特許審判・審決取消訴訟における争訟の一回的解決について"審判制度と知的財産訴訟の将来像に関する調査研究報告書(平成13年度特許庁工業所有権制度問題調査報告書). 19-32 (2002)

    • Related Report
      2002 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕 哲也: "特許審決取消訴訟基本構造論"株式会社 有斐閣. 433 (2003)

    • Related Report
      2002 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕哲也: "特許審決取消訴訟基本構造論"有斐閣(2002年6月刊行予定).

    • Related Report
      2001 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕哲也: "特許訂正審判と審決取消訴訟(刊行予定)"

    • Related Report
      2001 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 大渕哲也(単著): "特許審決取消訴訟基本構造論(有斐閣(9月刊行予定)/2001年)"

    • Related Report
      2000 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 相田義明(共著): "特許審査・審判及び審決取消訴訟(発明協会(夏刊行予定)/2001年)"

    • Related Report
      2000 Annual Research Report
  • [Publications] 隅蔵康一: "特許制度と生命倫理-再生医学が提起する問題"蛋白質核酸酵素. 45. 2336-2341 (2000)

    • Related Report
      2000 Annual Research Report

URL: 

Published: 2000-04-01   Modified: 2016-04-21  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi