| Project/Area Number |
12610517
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
英語・英米文学
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Ryukoku University (2001-2003)
Kobe College (2000) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
HIGASHIMORI Isao Ryukoku Univ., Dept.of Literature, Professor, 文学部, 教授 (20148604)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2000 – 2003
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2003)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,900,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2002: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥1,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | discourse connectives / relevance theory / grammaticalization / combinatory discourse connectives / ad hoc concept construction / procedural meaning / meaning changes / Sperber & Wilson / 概念的意味 / 手続き用意味 / 通時的 / 間投詞 / 通時的研究 / 手続的意味 / シェークスピア英語 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
1.(1),Meaning Changes of Discourse connectives(BUT, LIKE, WHY) in Shakespearean works can be fully explained by Ad hoc concept construction in Relevance Theory.
(2),English and Japanese combinatory discourse connectives(BUT STILL, DAGA+SHIKASHI) can be accounted for by cognitive pragmatics.
(3),As for the meaning changes of BUT STILL, I have pointed out that Diane Blakemore's recently published book<(2002) Meaning and Relevance : The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Connectives, Cambridge University Press>is quite insufficient.
(4),In order to explain combinatory discourse connectives, I have concluded that Sperber & Wilson's Relevance Theory is superior to Levinson's GCI account.
|
