• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Comparative Study of International Civil Procedure and Harmonization of Civil Procedure Law

Research Project

Project/Area Number 12620047
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Section一般
Research Field Civil law
Research InstitutionTohoku University

Principal Investigator

KAISE Yukio  Tohoku University, Graduate School of Law, Professor, 大学院・法学研究科, 教授 (90169376)

Project Period (FY) 2000 – 2001
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2001)
Budget Amount *help
¥1,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000)
Fiscal Year 2000: ¥800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000)
KeywordsComparative law in the United States / Reception of foreign law / Harmonization of civil procedural law / Comparative Civil Procedure / European code of civil procedure / Private international law in insolvency cases / International insolvency law / EU regulation / 比較法史 / 比較民事手続法 / ライマン / EU法 / ハーモナイゼイション
Research Abstract

1. In this research project, new directions of American comparative law are examined as a basic study for reception and transplant of foreign law, focusing at achievements of Mr. Mattias Reimaun, one of the leading comparative law scholars in the U.S.
2. To establish the theoretical foundation for harmonizing (procedural) law, following issues are analyzed: historical development of comparative civil procedure, legal transplants of procedural law, present situation of international project on comparative civil procedure, new idea of European code of civil procedure and comparative study of civil justice system. The study of comparative civil procedure contributes to create international rational legal practice, transplant efficient and fair judicial system, accelerate international harmonization of civil procedural law and provide general theory or philosophy for the reform of civil justice.
3. From a viewpoint of harmonizing procedural law and in comparison with German and EU law, choice-of law problems in international insolvency law and realize international harmonization of judgment, the ler fori concursus should be applied as a rule. The applications of the law with the most significant relationship are required in exceptional cases. Because Japanese law for recognition and assistance of foreign insolvency proceedings contains no choice-of-suggestive as a guideline for future developments of Japanese law. This regulation is translated into Japanese and compared with Japanese insolvency law.

Report

(3 results)
  • 2001 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report Summary
  • 2000 Annual Research Report
  • Research Products

    (5 results)

All Other

All Publications (5 results)

  • [Publications] 貝瀬幸雄: "EU規則(regulation)との比較"金融・商事判例. 1112. 65-85 (2001)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2001 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 青山善充: "民事訴訟法理論の新たな構築 上巻"有斐閣. 893 (2001)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(和文)」より
    • Related Report
      2001 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Yukio Kaise: "Comparison with the EU regulation"Kinyu Shoji Hanrei. 1112. 65-85 (2001)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2001 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] Yoshimitsu Aoyama: "New reconstruction of theory of civil procedure, vol.1"Yuhikaku. 893 (2001)

    • Description
      「研究成果報告書概要(欧文)」より
    • Related Report
      2001 Final Research Report Summary
  • [Publications] 高桑 昭: "新裁判実務大系・国際民事訴訟法(財産法)"青林書院新社. (2002)

    • Related Report
      2001 Annual Research Report

URL: 

Published: 2000-04-01   Modified: 2016-04-21  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi