| Project/Area Number |
13420006
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Public law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Okayama University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
HARANO Akira Okayama University, Faculty of Law, Professor (80032704)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
OKADA Masao Okayama University, Faculty of Law, Professor (90033422)
TAKEUCHI Toshiko Hiroshima Shudo University, Faculty of Law, Professor (70109247)
KOYAMA Masayoshi Himeji Dokkyo University, Faculty of Law, Professor (00144907)
MURAKAMI Hiroshi Kagawa University, Faculty of Law, Professor (00136839)
TAKAHASHI Masanori Okayama University, Faculty of Law, Associate Professor (30188057)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2001 – 2003
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2003)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥6,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥6,300,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥1,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000)
Fiscal Year 2002: ¥2,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,400,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥2,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | partnership / public-private partnerships / public legitimacy / privatization / citizen participation / NPO / governance / パートナーシップ |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
We intended to analyze and consider increasing public-private partnerships in local governments from "perspective of responsibility of public administration", thereby exploring a comprehensive theory that specifies the scope of public regulation on private activities and the potentials and limitations of public-private partnerships under phenomena of diversifying regulatory methods. To effectuate the design, we classified research subjects into three special fields : the first is to research theories, the second is to research comparative law, and the last is to analyze practices. We implemented the research by the way of letting three works collaborate as a whole, as follows;
In the first year, letting each research member to choose his/her own subject according to his/her specialty and to start the research, and holding a general meeting to elaborate the targets:
In the second year, continuing to let each research member to follow his/her target, and holding the general meeting designed to understand what other member is researching one another:
In the final year, holding a general meeting to let each member to report his/her research and exploring possibility of the comprehensive theory:
To be noted, we held Workshop for Public-Private Partnerships in the final year in order to share our results among the academic community of public law (administrative law), inviting some scholars outside of our group. Participants in the workshop gave us some ideas to build a comprehensive theory of public-private partnerships ; to focus on public "affairs" in defying "public", to identify different reasons why public-private partnerships are needed, and, to use a control mechanism adapted to the kind of public affairs.
|
