Project/Area Number |
13430021
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Economic history
|
Research Institution | Osaka University |
Principal Investigator |
SUGIHARA Kaoru Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics, Professor, 大学院・経済学研究科, 教授 (60117950)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
UEDA Hirofumi Osaka City University, Institute of Economics, Associate Professor, 経済研究所, 助教授 (10213357)
TANIMOTO Masayuki University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Economics, Associate Professor, 大学院・経済学研究科, 助教授 (10197535)
ABE Takeshi Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics, Professor, 大学院・経済学研究科, 教授 (10151101)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2001 – 2003
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2003)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥12,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥12,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥2,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,300,000)
Fiscal Year 2002: ¥3,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,300,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥6,600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥6,600,000)
|
Keywords | labour-intensive industrialization / the industrious revolution / factor endowments / natural resources / the cotton industry / traditional industry / Asian economic history / Japanese economic history |
Research Abstract |
This project attempted to deepen our understanding of Asia's industrialisation over the last hundred and fifty years in comparative historical perspective, by studying individual cases of Japan, China, India and other Asian countries, by comparing them with European. experiences, and by conceptualising a general pattern. The: main thrust of the historical, argument is, that Asia's industrialisation generally followed a labour-intensive path, that is, it attempted to introduce Western technology and organizations, not by directly transferring them but by replacing capital with labour whenever possible, because the factor endowments conditions in Asia favoured the maximum use of labour of a cheap but good quality. Reflecting this conceptualisation, some European cases were re-examined to argue that indeed they too had the tendency for a labour-intensive path, especially, compared with the American experience in the late nineteenth and the twentieth.: centuries where abundant capital and resources were mobilised and labour-saving technology was sought.
|