| Project/Area Number |
13610420
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Asian history
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kobe University (2004)
神戸商船大学 (2001-2003) |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
HAGIHARA Mamoru Kobe University, Faculty of Cross-Cultural Studies, Associate Professor, 国際文化学部, 助教授 (20208424)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2001 – 2004
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2004)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,300,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2002: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2001: ¥800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Ch'ing dynasty / Frontier region / Mongolia / Judicial control / Criminal judgment / Laws for ethnics / Administration by documents |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The first purpose of this scientific research is the comparative analysis of laws for various ethnics established by Ch'ing dynasty, Daqingluli, Huiminzhuantiao, Mengguli, Qindingbaqizeli, Huijiangzeli and Xizangtongzhi. And the second purpose is the inspection of Ch'ing dynasty's structure by using judicial researches about each frontier regions including Mongolia.
This paper consists of the first part "the research" and the second part "the translation of judicial documents". I write the conclusion of the first part here. The Ch'ing period in Mongolian history is the important one in which Mongolian tradition and its present political situation was formed, and in which the actual condition of Mongolian criminal judgments can be made clear for the first time. And the judicial research about frontier regions in Ch'ing dynasty is very insufficient compared with the one about China proper. Juridical effects of Huijiangzeli and Xizangtongzhi are very doubtful, but almost no research is made. So we can stimulate the research about them by researching the actual conditions of Mongolians, Banner-men and Huimin (Chinese Muslim). We must look out over the whole Ch'ing Empire and compare the Mongolian legal history with the Chinese one in it. And we must discuss the difference and the partial charge of each frontier regions and China proper.
I transcribed many Mongolian documents of judgments into Roman letters and translated them into Japanese in the second part of this paper to show the resources of judicial research and to compare the form in Mongolian and Manchurian documents with the one in Chinese.
|
