| Project/Area Number |
14510196
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
社会学(含社会福祉関係)
|
|---|
| Research Institution | SAGA University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KASHIZAWA Hideki SAGA University, Faculty of economics, professor, 経済学部, 教授 (60214293)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2002 – 2005
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2005)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,800,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000)
Fiscal Year 2002: ¥800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | environmental conflict / environmental impact assessment / two way communication / risk communication / mobilization of norms / 共考 / 有明海訴訟 / 決定の社会化 / 討議デモクラシー / 紛争処理 / コミュニケーション / 環境アセスメント |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The environmental impact assessment system in Japan lacks the point of view that it must contribute to proper dispute resolution. The largest reason of its lack is, I guess, that it doesn't need two way communications between developer and residents.
On the contrary to it, environmental problems include aspects of environmental risk now, therefore people demands participation in decision-making process.
Many sociologists and social psychologists have researched risk communications in different way. They rightly accept the two way communications. But they are researches to avoid conflicts in future, not to resolute conflicts which is brought about already. I have researched some cases about risk communication between developer and residents. I discovered that each side of developer and residents tried to communicate in favor of their self, therefore the communication advanced in neutral process. This neutral communication process has a contradiction that it have to ensure the endless communication process and produce any decision.
|
