| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,000,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000)
|
|---|
| Research Abstract |
I have researched into the problem of the possibility and the limit of psychoanalysis in the interpretation of art. This problem has an origin in two Freud's text: "Leonard da Vinci and his memory of infancy"(1910); "Michelangelo's Mose"(1914).The former applies the method of psychoanalysis to the interpretation of art, using its important concepts, unconscious, repression, return of repression, sexuality etc. The later, on the other hand, does not mention any of these concepts, but has a point of departure from the reaction of an observer (Freud himself).Freud, in this text, analyzes the detail of the "Mose" of Michelangelo, from which he deduces the unexpected interpretation. The detail functions as the "symptom." This method seems apparently to have nothing to do with the psychoanalysis. In this text, however, art becomes an event or an encounter to be renovated each timed think that "Michelangelo's Mose" of Freud could give an more renovative perspective to the interpretation of art.
|
