| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,400,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥2,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,400,000)
|
|---|
| Research Abstract |
The first contribution of this research is to introduce comparative method into discourse analysis, which has mainly been done by historical method("comparative historical sociology"). The second one is to introduce multi-area method into discourse analysis("education and welfare"), despite that discourse analyses usually cover only one subject area (e.g.education, medicine, sexuality.).
We collected and analyzed articles on education (especially on "examination" or "test") and articles on welfare (especially for old people) of "The Asahi Shimbun" and "The Tong-a Ilbo" every 9 years from 1920's to 1990's, with the cooperation of Asst.Prof.Park Jong-Ran of Inje University, South Korea.
The first finding of this research is the fact that there is sometimes remarkable continuity of discourse between Japan and South Korea, while there is sharp discontinuity at other times. For example, continuities about criticisms on entrance examination competition and cram schools, or "private care" and "the Welfare Law for the Aged" and discontinuity about "student strike" or "Changgyoengwon Koryo funeral".
The second finding is similarity and difference of basic social principles between two countries. It is common characteristic that the principle of "family" and "state" are very strong. However, there is sharp difference in the way how these principles function. In Japan, the principle of "state" overcomes that of "family", which is shown in "Joint University Entrance Examination", "Report Card system" in the prewar period, and the early legislation of "the Welfare Law for the Aged". On the other hand, the principle of "family" functions stronger than that of "state" in Korea. However, the latter began to gain strength in 1970's to 1980's, the fact which is shown in prohibition of "cram school" and the legislation of "the Welfare Law for the Aged".
|
