| Project/Area Number |
15560219
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Intelligent mechanics/Mechanical systems
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kyoto University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
KAWAKAMI Hiroshi Kyoto University, Graduate School of Informatics, Department of Systems Science, Associate Professor, 情報学研究科, 助教授 (90214600)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
SUTO Hidetsugu Akita Municipal Junior College of Arts and Crafts, Department of Industrial Design, Lecturer, 産業デザイン学科, 講師 (90352525)
HANDA Hisashi Okayama University, Faculty of Engineering, Assistant Professor, 工学部, 助手 (60304333)
SHIOSE Takayuki Kyoto University, Graduate School of Informatics, Department of Systems Science, Assistant Professor, 情報学研究科, 助手 (90332759)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2003 – 2005
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2005)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,400,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥1,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥1,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000)
Fiscal Year 2003: ¥1,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | Universal Design / Interactive Artifact / Generous Constraint / Affordance / Segmentation / Inclusive Design / 制約充足問題 / 認知的課題の変化 / 様相論理 / 設計支援 / 様相理論 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
To address the situation where recent methodologies of Universal Design (UD) become estranged from "the principles of UD" originated with R.Mace, we examined guidelines for UD by employing notions of systems science. The guidelines regard re-designs by alterations of physical quantities as a last resort. The guidelines aim to focus designers' intentions to qualitative gropes. The axis of our research is our assumption of a sufficient condition on UD : "instead of enforcing an unique optimized operation-sequence, they are open to various interpretations" and "generous constraints afford possible operations" and "interactions between a operation and the following alterations of affordance can be interpreted as a conversation." We broke this axis down into three sub-axes that are interdependent with each other.
The first sub-axis was to elucidate the concepts : "generous constraint" and "interaction as conversation." For this purpose, we proposed models of "generous constraint" by modal lo
… More
gics and by the arbitrariness of information channels in terms of Qualitative Information Theory. We also proposed a framework of a design support system based on "interaction as conversation" defined from the viewpoint of alethic, deontic and temporal modalities, and teleological-causal necessities.
The second sub-axis was bridging from qualitative to quantitative design processes. Adopting genetic algorithms, we developed a constraint solver that treats qualitative statements as constraints then decides quantitative parameters.
The third sub-axis was actual proofs. The results of first and second axes were applied to several designs. For example, we participated in the project of designing rest rooms in the ward of a rehabilitation center in Osaka pref., that of designing entrance gates of unattended bicycle parking lots with a venture company in Kyoto city, and that of web pages.
Furthermore, for comparing with UD, we invited Ms. Jullia Cassim, the leading expert of Inclusive Design, and carried out a workshop. Less
|
