| Project/Area Number |
15H03304
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
New fields of law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Keio University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
YAMAMOTO Hajime 慶應義塾大学, 法務研究科(三田), 教授 (10222382)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
興津 征雄 神戸大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (10403213)
高山 佳奈子 京都大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (30251432)
西谷 祐子 京都大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (30301047)
小畑 郁 名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (40194617)
齊藤 真紀 京都大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (60324597)
船越 資晶 京都大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (70362548)
横山 美夏 京都大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (80200921)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
MATSUMOTO Emi 青山学院大学, 法学部, 教授 (50303102)
FUJITANI Takeshi 東京大学, 社会科学研究所, 准教授 (90313056)
MATSUO Hiroshi 慶應義塾大学, 法務研究科, 教授 (50229431)
MATSUDA Takeshi 大阪大学, 高等司法研究科, 教授 (70324738)
IGIMI Mariko 九州大学, 法学(政治学)研究科(研究院), 教授 (30284384)
SUAMI Takao 早稲田大学, 法務研究科, 教授 (80262418)
ISHIYAMA Fumihiko 中央大学, 法学部, 教授 (80221761)
OGINO Nao 同志社大学, 法学部, 教授 (30546669)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2015-04-01 – 2018-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥16,120,000 (Direct Cost: ¥12,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥3,720,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥5,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥5,200,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,200,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥5,720,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,320,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | グローバル化 / 法学研究 / 法学教育 / 学際的研究 / 国家主権 / 法源 / 民主主義 / 人権 / 企業統治 / 公法と私法 / 法の多元化 / 法の変容 / 法学領域論 / 法的思考様式 / 法曹論 / 国家主権の変容 / 法のネットワーク化 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
With respect to human rights theory, we examined the relationship between International human rights treaty organizations and domestic jurisdictions, and the legal methods available for responding to new legal issues surrounding international family relations. As for public law theory, we examined how globalization is influencing public law paradigms. In administrative law, we examined "democratic legitimacy" in administrative process. In terms of criminal law, we examined how laws and regulations differ between each country based on culture and religion. As for commercial law, we examined orders that can substitute state orders. In relation to jurisprudence, we discussed how the balancing of interests is dominating legal thinking in a globalizing world. As for legal education under globalization, we discussed the significance of supporting legal and judicial reform, and that of legal education provided by Japan to other Asian countries.
|
