Defining software integrity levels using argumentation theory
Project/Area Number |
15K00100
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Section | 一般 |
Research Field |
Software
|
Research Institution | Nara Institute of Science and Technology |
Principal Investigator |
Takai Toshinori 奈良先端科学技術大学院大学, 情報科学研究科, 客員准教授 (10425738)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
高橋 和子 関西学院大学, 理工学部, 教授 (30330400)
松野 裕 日本大学, 理工学部, 准教授 (70534220)
木藤 浩之 電気通信大学, 大学院情報理工学研究科, 客員研究員 (90705287)
|
Co-Investigator(Renkei-kenkyūsha) |
FURUSAWA Hitoshi 鹿児島大学, 理工学域理学系, 教授 (00357930)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2015-04-01 – 2018-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥4,680,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,080,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
|
Keywords | アシュアランスケース / 論証 / 議論 / ゴール構造化表記法 / 抽象対話議論 / アシュアランス / 数理議論学 / 双極対話議論 / インテグリティレベル / ソフトウェア受け入れテスト / 議論フレームワーク / リスク共有 / 消費者向けシステム |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
We proposed a bipolar multirelational evidence-based argumentation framework for describing assurance cases with explicit counter-arguments. For the semantics of the framework, we also propose a subclass of abstract dialectical framework, called an evidence-based abstract dialectical framework and showed that conflict-freeness and the preferred-extension can be defined for that framework. Moreover, we also proposed a modular construction for assurance cases. Precisely, we proposed criteria for modular constructions among assurance cases and we showed a sufficient condition of a subclass of defeasible goal structuring notations for that criteria. This result can be the basis for defining decomposition of software integrity levels.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(8 results)