Budget Amount *help |
¥4,680,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,080,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,820,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥420,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
This study examined political and technological development of deep geological repository in both France and Finland. In France, because of high radiation dose from reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, local residents opposed to accept the final disposal of high-level radioactive waste. To avoid this opposition, France established so called the Bataille Act of 30 December 1991 and pushed the reversible deep geological repository. As for Finland, taking direct method for disposing of spent nuclear fuel, they began to investigate sites for deep geological repository in 1980s and they decided to construct this repository in Eurajoki municipality in 2001. One of the reasons why Eurajoki municipality accepted the repository was that Teollisuuden Voima (TVO) paid a large amount of tax for them. From the comparison of both two countries cases, this study concluded that Japan would follow a kind of French way of reversible deep geological repository.
|