A Study of the principle of appropriate procedural fairness and remedies for the subject steering environmental spheres
| Project/Area Number |
15K03132
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Public law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Hiroshima Shudo University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
Kengo Yamada 広島修道大学, 法学部, 教授 (10314907)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2015-04-01 – 2018-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,160,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥960,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,690,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥390,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 環境行政 / 手続的公正 / 環境行政決定 / 参加手続 / 適正手続 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
The participant in the decision process must receive administrative decision so that environmental administration decision functions in society. In Australia, the U.K. and the United States, it is argued about reception of the administrative decision by the participant in administrative decision making process. Various approaches are carried out in statute law and the practice to facilitate reception of the administrative decision. However, procedural fairness doctrine is not applied to a participation procedure, and, like Japan, the reception is not necessarily related with procedural fairness.
This study state the following that (1)procedural fairness exists for securing personal dignity,(2) procedural consideration for the dignity is necessary so that a procedure participant having various attributes receives environmental administration decision easily,,and (3) contents of the procedural fairness to facilitate decision reception.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(3 results)
