| Project/Area Number |
15K03214
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Civil law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Kumamoto University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
matsubara hironobu 熊本大学, 大学院人文社会科学研究部(法), 教授 (20190499)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2015-04-01 – 2018-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,120,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥720,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 当事者適格 / 訴訟追行権 / 実体（事件）適格 / 法人でない社団 / 固有適格構成 / 再審原告適格 / 検察官を被告とする死後認知訴訟 / 会社組織関係訴訟 / 固有適格概念 / 訴訟担当構成 / 死後認知訴訟 / 被告適格 / 既判力 / 当事者概念 / 当事者権 / 実体適格 / 当事者適格概念 / 事件（実体）適格 / 理論的基礎 / 当事者適格概念不用説 / 当事者適格概念併用説 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
①I made clear that the concept of standing in Japan is necessary with a concept of process-leading-right in Germany,after critical Consideration for opposite opinion. ② I made clear that proper-standing-construction on standing of unincorporated association was not clear with the reason of different meaning, after consideration of history ob opinion in detail,and proposed clear construction.And I made clear that members of unincorporated association hat res judicata because they are real party in interest.And,③I made clear that standing in new trial should be different from standing in original-process under status-suit and company-suit,after critical consideration for case.
|
