Comparative Study of the Usage of Expertise in Medical Litigation -Beyond Document by Court-appointed Experts and Cross Exmination
| Project/Area Number |
15K03256
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
New fields of law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Ritsumeikan University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2015-04-01 – 2018-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,550,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,050,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 医療訴訟 / 専門家の活用 / カンファレンス尋問 / 鑑定 / 専門訴訟 / 診療ガイドライン / 専門委員 / 専門家証人 / 専門的知見の活用 / コンカレント・エヴィデンス / カンファレンス鑑定 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Courts in Japan have been suffering from the chronic shortage of experts willing to act as assessors. A single expert’s advice in writing tends to be too specialised or technical to help the court.
This research proposes a new hybrid method combining which is capable of wider practical application in Japan, i.e. a roundtable conference of a court-appointed assessor and party-instructed experts. It has many advantages such as participation of experts of good quality, impovement in the quality of evidence and judgement, feedback to scinentific community, Pocedural fairness, publicity and transparency and saving time and cost.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(18 results)
