Research on legislative and administrative discretion in naturalization from a comparative constitutional law perspective
Project/Area Number |
15K16921
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Research Field |
Public law
|
Research Institution | Dokkyo University (2017) Osaka University (2015-2016) |
Principal Investigator |
Pedriza Luis 獨協大学, 法学部, 准教授 (60511988)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2015-04-01 – 2018-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥3,120,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥720,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
|
Keywords | 帰化 / 比較憲法 / 国籍離脱の自由 / 制度的保障 / 外国人 / 基本権能力 / 帰化制度 / 国籍法律主義 / 外国人の基本的人権 / 基本的人権享有主体 / 憲法 / 機能主義 / 外国人の権利 / スペイン |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Following a comparative constitutional law approach, in this research I have assessed the constitutional range the institution of naturalization, a topic which had been neglected by most constitutional law scholars in Japan. By departing from the traditional perspective that naturalization is a matter to be completely decided upon on a legislative level, I postulated that the naturalization is an constitutional institution which core content cannot be encroached upon by the lawmaker. On the other hand, I have succeeded in putting forward a new interpretation on the right to abandon one's nationality (Article 22.2 of the Constitution) as one granting those permanent foreign residents who have developed strong bonds with the Japanese nation a right to have access to Japanese nationality. As a result, I have showed to what extent legislative and administrative discretion are limited on deciding how to implement naturalization and how to conduct naturalization issues respectively.
|
Report
(4 results)
Research Products
(7 results)