• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

A legal comparison on the storage and accumulation of information by the investigation agency and the total surveillance

Research Project

Project/Area Number 15K16944
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Research Field Criminal law
Research InstitutionKumamoto University

Principal Investigator

NAITOH HIROMI  熊本大学, 大学院人文社会科学研究部(法), 准教授 (00451394)

Project Period (FY) 2015-04-01 – 2019-03-31
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2018)
Budget Amount *help
¥3,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥900,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2015: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Keywords情報収集 / 密行的捜査 / 捜査の密行性 / 監視型捜査 / 密行的処分 / 行政警察 / 犯罪対策 / データベース / おとり捜査 / 刑事訴訟法 / 捜査
Outline of Final Research Achievements

The information gathering of administrative police must be based on administrative law. But the requirement of the measure according to administrative law is lighter than that of the measure according to the prosecution. As a result, the measures of the information gathering for the purpose of administrative police are sometimes diverted for the investigation or prosecution. The legalization of measures for the administrative information gathering is required. But based on the focus theory in Germany, it must be clear, in which area of law the condition of the measure must be divided, if the same measure can fulfill the both purposes, so that the reclassification is avoided.
In case-law, the right to the information privacy, the dangerousness due to the stealth and easiness of the information gathering, is interesting. The positioning of the right to information privacy is not necessarily clear, but the research is basically the same position as the GPS judgment of the Supreme Court.

Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements

現代的犯罪に適切に対応するために情報収集は必須である。しかしながら、国家機関における過度の情報集積は個人の私的生活の全貌の把握を可能にする危険がある。また、取得情報の保存・利用の如何によっては、その危険性はかなりのレベルで度増大する。本研究は、情報収集の必要性を認めつつ、そこに一定程度の規制をかけることで国家による適正な情報収集を保障しようとすることを目指したものである。

Report

(5 results)
  • 2018 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2017 Research-status Report
  • 2016 Research-status Report
  • 2015 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (5 results)

All 2019 2018 2017 2016

All Journal Article (5 results) (of which Peer Reviewed: 3 results,  Open Access: 2 results,  Acknowledgement Compliant: 2 results)

  • [Journal Article] おとり捜査の判例分析(特集 もっと違法を主張しよう!)2019

    • Author(s)
      内藤大海
    • Journal Title

      季刊刑事弁護

      Volume: 97 Pages: 84-89

    • NAID

      40021800220

    • Related Report
      2018 Annual Research Report
  • [Journal Article] なりすまし捜査の適法性と証拠能力2018

    • Author(s)
      内藤大海
    • Journal Title

      速報判例解説

      Volume: 23 Pages: 201-204

    • Related Report
      2018 Annual Research Report
    • Peer Reviewed
  • [Journal Article] 犯罪対策と情報収集―情報データベースの構築と警察介入の早期化―2018

    • Author(s)
      内藤大海
    • Journal Title

      犯罪と刑罰

      Volume: 27 Pages: 101-109

    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
  • [Journal Article] おとり捜査の違法の帰結に関するドイツ判例の動き2017

    • Author(s)
      内藤大海
    • Journal Title

      熊本法学

      Volume: 139号

    • Related Report
      2016 Research-status Report
    • Peer Reviewed / Open Access / Acknowledgement Compliant
  • [Journal Article] 総合的監視に関する予備的考察2016

    • Author(s)
      内藤大海
    • Journal Title

      熊本法学

      Volume: 136号 Pages: 157-193

    • Related Report
      2015 Research-status Report
    • Peer Reviewed / Open Access / Acknowledgement Compliant

URL: 

Published: 2015-04-16   Modified: 2020-03-30  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi