| Project/Area Number |
16360308
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Architectural history/design
|
|---|
| Research Institution | University of Tsukuba |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
FUJIKAWA Masaki University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, Associate Professor, 大学院システム情報工学研究科, 助教授 (90228974)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
WATANABE Shun University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, Associate Professor, 大学院システム情報工学研究科, 助教授 (60212320)
KURODA Nobu University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, Associate Professor, 大学院人間総合科学研究科, 助教授 (40375457)
UEKITA Yasufumi University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, Assistant Professor, 大学院人間総合科学研究科, 講師 (00232736)
YOSHIDA Tomohiko University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, Assistant Professor, 大学院システム情報工学研究科, 講師 (40283494)
KOJIMA Kazuko University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Assistant Professor, 大学院人文社会科学研究科, 講師 (00344854)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2004 – 2006
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2006)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥10,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥10,900,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥3,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,100,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥4,100,000 (Direct Cost: ¥4,100,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥3,700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,700,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | East Asia / Conservation of Historic District / Urban Conservation / Courtyard House / Beijing / Kyoto / Historic Areas / National Preservation District for Groups of Important Buildings / 伝統的都市 / 歴史的文化保護区 / 皿合院 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
Preserving "historic district" is the most effective method to conserve the landscape of historic cities, which are adopted in many countries.
In this study, in order to think about the future of preserving historic district, we took Kyoto and Beijing for examples. These two cities are well-known as historic capitals and have many in common. But the concrete preserving methods are quite different from each other in many respects such as the whole conservation planning, the location of preservation districts, the extent of the district, and the architectural preservation way in the district.
Since this kind of difference reflects each urban history and social circumstances, we cannot evaluate which method is superior. All we can do is to improve each method after recognizing the differences and (dis) advantages.
|
