Project/Area Number |
16402020
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 海外学術 |
Research Field |
Business administration
|
Research Institution | Kyoto University |
Principal Investigator |
TAO Masao Kyoto University, School of Government, Professor (40094403)
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
TACHIOKA Hiroshi Hanazono University, Faculty of Social Welfare, Associate Professor (40301650)
YOSHIDA Tadahiko Kinki University, Faculty of Business Administration, Professor (20210700)
KANAGAWA Koji Okayama University of Science, Faculty of Informatics, Professor (00341470)
WAKABAYASHI Naoki Kyoto University, Graduate School of Economics, Professor (80242155)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2004 – 2007
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2007)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥14,390,000 (Direct Cost: ¥13,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥990,000)
Fiscal Year 2007: ¥4,290,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,300,000、Indirect Cost: ¥990,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥3,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,400,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥2,800,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,800,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥3,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,900,000)
|
Keywords | Public Private Partnership / Pubic Service Reform / Public Management / Local Government / Comparative Analysis / Local Community Development / 日英比較 / 官民協働パートナーシップ / 行政改革 / 地域経営 / 地方自治体経営 / 国際比較調査 / 英国 / ニュージーランド・モデル / 医療・福祉 |
Research Abstract |
The main aim of this research project is to investigate and examine how the public private partnership model transforms and improves local public service systems. We examine changes and effects of the PPP, by doing international comparative deep case studies across UK, New Zealand, US, Belgium and Japan, and discussing its implication within international academic conferences such as the international PPP conference and the National Conference of Voluntary Organization. We can indentify following five features of the PPP effects from our studies. First, the UK and other governments facilitate the empowerment to local communities in terms of local public service improvements. Second, the PPP need establishment of the new local network governance of local public service and transform the role of local government in it. Third, the PPP is much valid for the modernization of soft public services like school improvements, medical services, film commissions. Fourth, as several private firms in the support service industry tend to take initiatives of the PPP, behaviors of such firms become more significant in its practices and performances. Fifth, in the advanced privatization areas of public services like water supply, globalization, diversification and conglomeration of private firms supporting the PPP mainly shape substantial transformation of the PPP.
|