• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Cranioplasty using an internal absorbable distraction device

Research Project

Project/Area Number 16591798
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeSingle-year Grants
Section一般
Research Field Plastic surgery
Research InstitutionJuntendo University

Principal Investigator

KOMURO Yuzo  JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY, School of Medicine, Assistant professor, 医学部, 助教授 (90306928)

Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) IMAZAWA Takashi  JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY, School of Medicine, Staff surgeon, 医学部, 助手 (90296872)
HASHIZUME Katsumichi  JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY, School of Medicine, Staff surgeon, 医学部, 助手 (90365643)
Project Period (FY) 2004 – 2006
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2006)
Budget Amount *help
¥3,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,500,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥600,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥1,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000)
Fiscal Year 2004: ¥1,900,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,900,000)
Keywordsgradual distraction method / distraction device / poly lactic acid / biodegradable / skull bone / rabbit
Research Abstract

For years, cranoiplasty using distraction osteogenesis has been used for patients with craniosynostosis. One of the current disadvantage of this technique is the necessity of a second operation to remove devices. For the purpose of performing this technique without a second operation, we performed cranial advancement by distraction using an absorbable distraction device in rabbits.
Osteotomy was performed in the parietal region and an absorbable distraction device was placed in the parietal region. An absorbable distraction device was manufactured from polylactic acid. Distraction was initiated 5 days postoperatively. The width of distraction was 0.5mm per day. Distraction was continued until the total width was up to 10mm. The effect of distraction was assessed on roentgen-film.
Cranial bone was successfully distracted.
Polylactic acid is a biodegradable material used for bone fixation implants. The main disadvantage of an internal absorbable distraction device is its lower intensity compared with metallic components. In our experiments, it has been proven that an absorbable device is fit for the distraction of cranial bone.

Report

(4 results)
  • 2006 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report Summary
  • 2005 Annual Research Report
  • 2004 Annual Research Report

URL: 

Published: 2004-04-01   Modified: 2016-04-21  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi