Understanding Welfare Politics in Northeast Asia with Multiple Cleavages
Project/Area Number |
16F16308
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows
|
Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
Section | 外国 |
Research Field |
Politics
|
Research Institution | The University of Tokyo |
Principal Investigator |
|
Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
SHIM JAEMIN 東京大学, 社会科学研究所, 外国人特別研究員
|
Project Period (FY) |
2016-11-07 – 2019-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥1,400,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,400,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥700,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000)
|
Keywords | political cleavages / social welfare / Japan / Taiwan / Korea / legislation / Cleavages / Political parties / East Asia / Measurement / Mixed-methods / Democratic transition |
Outline of Annual Research Achievements |
This project examines the origin and development of key political cleavages in Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Cleavages separate voters into advocates and adversaries on a certain issue or into voting for a certain party. The central puzzle stems from the unique contexts of East Asia, in which encompassing trade unions and left-wing parties have not been the primary political forces of the latest expansions in social welfare. Applying Lipset and Rokkan’s seminal work on cleavage and party politics (1967), our analysis suggests that major politicized cleavages in the three Asian countries have not revolved around social-distribution issues, but instead focus on nationalism, provincialism, or rural-urban divisions.
Specifically, we triangulate results from multiple datasets such as manifestos, elite surveys, voting patterns, public opinion surveys, roll call votes, bill sponsor/co-sponsorship, and newspaper articles. We examine the primary cleavages formed during each country’s democratic transition by looking at how basic legislative dimensions such as the numbers, proportion, success ratio, and duration of submitted bills have differed over time. Moreover, 15 English-language published papers on measuring political cleavages―either explicitly or implicitly―in Korea, Japan, and Taiwan are examined using quantitative datasets. Collectively, these sources include both mass and elite level data.
|
Research Progress Status |
翌年度、交付申請を辞退するため、記入しない。
|
Strategy for Future Research Activity |
翌年度、交付申請を辞退するため、記入しない。
|
Report
(2 results)
Research Products
(5 results)