| Project/Area Number |
16H07006
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Research Field |
Public law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Yamaguchi University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2016-08-26 – 2018-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,730,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥630,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 外国人の人権 / 出入国管理 / 入管法 / フランス / 行政裁量統制 / 法的性質決定 / ジョセフ・カレンズ / 裁量 / 在留特別許可 / ガイドライン / 不法在留罪 / 不法残留罪 / 外国人の出入国管理 / フランス法 / 行政裁量 / 外国人 / 事実の法的性質決定 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Global migration is a growing phenomenon, which affects nations with both legal and moral dilemmas. Japan is no exception; it faces pressures to enhance human mobility over borders and to strengthen homeland and national security, and thus is in need of legal reforms suggested in this study:
1) Although there has been a strong moral claim to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants, prominently by J. H. Carens, such amnesty is still incompatible with the current Japanese legal systems; 2) Even acknowledging the possibility of human rights violations under the current immigration law, the Japanese courts are reluctant to annul deportations; 3) The Conseil d'Etat in France on the other hand, drawing primarily on rights protected under ECHR and EU treaty rights, has established a doctrine that limits administrative discretion in favour of immigrants facing deportation. Japanese courts are advised, with the necessary adjustments, to be likewise proactive in scrutinising administrative decisions.
|
