Budget Amount *help |
¥4,810,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,110,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,950,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥450,000)
|
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
For constant monitoring and recording of pollutants in an aquatic environment, following characteristics were examined in order to execute the time-weighted average sampling method (passive method): water sampling conditions and the pretreatment of the passive method for raw water; screening of priority evaluation items; applicability of target compounds to the passive method by the calibration test; application of the adoption method to actual water environment; and application of high throughput multicomponent screening analysis by high resolution MS to tap water. In purified water and raw water, a linear increase was observed between the amount of pollutants adsorbed on the solid phase and the dipping days in most of the target pesticides and metals. The analysis of the one month sampling results (tap water) by UPLC/Qtof showed that various pesticides were detected by passive sampling as compared to those by spot sampling; thereby demonstrating the superiority of passive method.
|