• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Litigation Masters and Lawyers during the Late Qing and Republican Periods: Modernity in the History of Chinese Litigation

Research Project

Project/Area Number 16K03080
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Section一般
Research Field History of Asia and Africa
Research InstitutionKyoto University

Principal Investigator

Fuma Susumu  京都大学, 文学研究科, 名誉教授 (10093303)

Project Period (FY) 2016-04-01 – 2020-03-31
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2019)
Budget Amount *help
¥4,680,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥1,080,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
Keywords訟師 / 訟棍 / 律師 / 弁護士 / 中国 / 清末民初 / 申報 / 龍泉司法档案 / 民国時代 / 訴訟 / 代書 / 清末・民国 / 清末 / 民国 / 裁判 / 清代 / 『申報』 / 中国近代
Outline of Final Research Achievements

The first research outcome was the publication of my essay entitled “The Growing Prominence of the Perception of Lawyers and Changes in the Perception of Litigation Masters as seen in the Shenbao Newspaper during the Late Qing Period-;From Litigation Master to Lawyer.” The Shenbao Newspaper reveals that the prominence of foreign lawyers in Shanghai prompted a reevaluation of lawyers among Chinese people, which led to support for the argument, far earlier than it occurred in the central government, that China needed lawyers. The essay traces the argument that the overabundance of “pettifoggers” in China could be transformed into lawyers. The second research outcome was a workshop held for Chinese scholars devoted to the issue of the Longquan Judicial Archives. In addition, I conducted a survey of archives related to Baduzhen during the Republican Period that are held at Zhejiang University.

Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements

研究成果の学術的意義の第一は、清末政府が訴訟制度の近代化を図り律師制度を構想するはるか以前に、『申報』では律師(弁護士)の問題について様々に議論されたことを明らかにした点である。問題の一つは伝統的な大量の訟師をどうするかであり、近代律師制度の妨げとなるとしながら、訟師を律師に転用できないかとの議論まであった。また『龍泉司法档案』の重要さに着目し、中国の研究者とワークショップを開き、民国期の国家と社会を究明する上でその重要さをアピールしたことも、おおきな成果である。

Report

(5 results)
  • 2019 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2018 Research-status Report
  • 2017 Research-status Report
  • 2016 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (7 results)

All 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

All Journal Article (4 results) (of which Peer Reviewed: 4 results) Presentation (3 results) (of which Invited: 1 results)

  • [Journal Article] 『龍泉司法档案』と龍泉司法档案研読会-とくに民国初年、教育界と商業界による警察糾弾案件をめぐって-2020

    • Author(s)
      夫馬進
    • Journal Title

      東方学

      Volume: 139 Pages: 91-100

    • Related Report
      2019 Annual Research Report
    • Peer Reviewed
  • [Journal Article] 清末『申報』所見律師観的発展及訟師観的変遷-由訟師到律師(一)2018

    • Author(s)
      夫馬進
    • Journal Title

      法律史訳評

      Volume: 6 Pages: 221-241

    • Related Report
      2018 Research-status Report
    • Peer Reviewed
  • [Journal Article] 清末『申報』に見る律師観の進展と訟師観の推移2017

    • Author(s)
      夫馬進
    • Journal Title

      東方学

      Volume: 134 Pages: 1-27

    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
    • Peer Reviewed
  • [Journal Article] 清末巴県”健訟棍徒”何輝山与裁判式調解"憑団理剖"2016

    • Author(s)
      夫馬進
    • Journal Title

      中国古代法律文献研究

      Volume: 10 Pages: 395-420

    • Related Report
      2016 Research-status Report
    • Peer Reviewed
  • [Presentation] 中国史と世界史の中での訟師1・22019

    • Author(s)
      夫馬進
    • Organizer
      南開大学歴史講座
    • Related Report
      2019 Annual Research Report
    • Invited
  • [Presentation] 清末上海外国人律師的出現与訟師観的改変-「中国歴史特有的形態」与近代化2017

    • Author(s)
      夫馬進
    • Organizer
      ホンコン大学中文学院 21世紀的明清:新資格、新発見、新領域
    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
  • [Presentation] 明洪武帝論:中国近世史上、独創性的改革家2017

    • Author(s)
      夫馬進
    • Organizer
      中央研究院歴史語言研究所傅斯年講座
    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report

URL: 

Published: 2016-04-21   Modified: 2021-02-19  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi