Plea Negotiations and Agreements and Evidence Rules
| Project/Area Number |
16K03366
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Criminal law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Osaka University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2016-04-01 – 2020-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2019)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥2,470,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥570,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥520,000 (Direct Cost: ¥400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥120,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 刑事手続 / 協議・合意 / 司法取引 / 証拠法 / イタリア法 / 組織犯罪対策 / 刑事訴訟法 / 新時代の刑事司法 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
In this research, in view of the relationship between the system of plea negotiations and agreements and the evidence rules, the interpretation of the principal evidence rules such as the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence and the confession rule has been critically examined and reconstructed, and the content of the “collaborator of Justice(collaboratore di Giustizia)” system and the relevant evidence rules in Italy has been investigated for a comparative reference.
|
| Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
本研究の学問的・社会的意義は、2016年刑訴法改正によって導入された司法取引の一種である「証拠収集等への協力及び訴追に関する合意制度」のもとで得られた証拠の取扱いのあり方を念頭に置きつつ、イタリア法における類似の制度との比較の結果をも考慮に入れて、一定の利益と引き換えに得られた供述を裁判所が事実認定に供する際の問題性を特定し、証拠諸法則の根拠や証拠評価の方法をめぐる従来の議論を再構成する点にある。
|
Report
(5 results)
Research Products
(8 results)
