• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Modern Reconstruction of "criminal acts against public order"

Research Project

Project/Area Number 16K03368
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Section一般
Research Field Criminal law
Research InstitutionKyushu University

Principal Investigator

NOZAWA Mitsuru  九州大学, 法学研究院, 教授 (70386811)

Project Period (FY) 2016-04-01 – 2020-03-31
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2019)
Budget Amount *help
¥4,160,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥960,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,560,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥360,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Keywords刑法 / 業務妨害罪 / 公共の平穏 / 社会法益 / 刑事法制史 / 刑事立法 / 刑事法学 / 業務妨害 / 立法論
Outline of Final Research Achievements

As a result of analyzing and examining the significance of the criminal pattern of “criminal acts against public order” in Chapter 7 of the German Penal Code, it was found that Chapter 7 was stipulated by special circumstances, and it was revealed that Article 126 “Interruption of public peace by threatening crime” was changed to a more concrete and clarified language than the previous one in the amendment of 1976.
In addition, in response to such "simple acts that undermine public peace," there is a tendency in Japan to operate "intervention crimes" without stopping, and this has the problem of violating the criminal statute, it was also made clear that there was a need for a new criminal legislation with the very German-like provisions mentioned above.

Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements

日本では「単純な公共の平穏を害する行為」を直接に処罰する規定がなく、そのような行為を「業務妨害罪」の無理やりな解釈論によって対処しようとする状況が見られる。本研究により処罰規定のそのような運用の問題点を示すことで、一般的には「解釈論の限界」を理論的に示すと同時に、また当該行為態様に対する新たな処罰規定の必要性およびそのあり方を示すことで、「(刑事)立法論の必要性の明確化」をも理論的に示すことを可能にした。これは新たな事例が現れるたびにケースバイケースに行われがちな刑事立法に、理論的一貫性を与えるものといえ、その将来的な学術的・社会的意義は計り知れないものといえる。

Report

(5 results)
  • 2019 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2018 Research-status Report
  • 2017 Research-status Report
  • 2016 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (10 results)

All 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Other

All Int'l Joint Research (2 results) Journal Article (5 results) (of which Peer Reviewed: 1 results,  Open Access: 3 results) Book (1 results) Remarks (2 results)

  • [Int'l Joint Research] エアランゲン=ニュルンベルク大学(ドイツ)

    • Related Report
      2019 Annual Research Report
  • [Int'l Joint Research] エアランゲン=ニュルンベルク大学(ドイツ)

    • Related Report
      2018 Research-status Report
  • [Journal Article] ドイツライヒ刑法典(1871年)の編纂過程について2020

    • Author(s)
      野澤充
    • Journal Title

      法政研究

      Volume: 87巻2号

    • Related Report
      2019 Annual Research Report
    • Peer Reviewed / Open Access
  • [Journal Article] 虚偽犯罪予告行為と業務妨害罪・再論2019

    • Author(s)
      野澤充
    • Journal Title

      法政研究

      Volume: 85巻3・4合併号 Pages: 285-307

    • NAID

      120006606481

    • Related Report
      2018 Research-status Report
    • Open Access
  • [Journal Article] 窃盗罪における「財産損害」?──「相当額の対価」が存在する事例に関連して2018

    • Author(s)
      野澤充
    • Journal Title

      立命館法学

      Volume: 375・376号 Pages: 264-289

    • NAID

      120006469339

    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
  • [Journal Article] 刑法典における一般的自首規定の制度根拠──明治期以降の規定を素材に2017

    • Author(s)
      野澤充
    • Journal Title

      法政研究

      Volume: 84巻3号

    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
    • Open Access
  • [Journal Article] 中止犯規定は単なる「量刑規定」か?2016

    • Author(s)
      野澤充
    • Journal Title

      『浅田和茂先生古稀祝賀論文集』

      Volume: 上巻 Pages: 433-449

    • Related Report
      2016 Research-status Report
  • [Book] トーマス・フォルンバウム ドイツ現代刑事法史入門2020

    • Author(s)
      公文孝佳・野澤充共訳
    • Publisher
      成文堂
    • Related Report
      2019 Annual Research Report
  • [Remarks] 刑法典における一般的自首規定の制度根拠──明治期以降の規定を素材に

    • URL

      https://catalog.lib.kyushu-u.ac.jp/opac_download_md/1913972/p284.pdf

    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
  • [Remarks] 窃盗罪における「財産損害」?──「相当額の対価」が存在する事例に関連して

    • URL

      http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/cg/law/lex/17-56/013nozawa.pdf

    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report

URL: 

Published: 2016-04-21   Modified: 2021-02-19  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi