• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Unit of Dispute Resolution and Binding Effect of Adjudication

Research Project

Project/Area Number 16K03399
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Section一般
Research Field Civil law
Research InstitutionNagoya University

Principal Investigator

WATANABE MIYUKI  名古屋大学, 法学研究科, 教授 (40271853)

Project Period (FY) 2016-04-01 – 2019-03-31
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2018)
Budget Amount *help
¥3,250,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥750,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,170,000 (Direct Cost: ¥900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥270,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Keywords訴訟物 / 既判力 / 確定判決と同一の効力 / 仲裁判断の既判力 / 判決効 / 判断の拘束力 / 手続目的 / 家事審判の既判力 / 民事法学 / 民事訴訟法
Outline of Final Research Achievements

In this research, the relationship between an object of civil procedure (including arbitration and domestic case relations procedure etc) and the binding effect of an adjudication of a neutral third party is examined. As the starting point with the argument over Art.114 Code of Civil Procedure, which stipulates the scope of res judicata, I remarked that the Japanese rule of Res Judicata should be reexamined from the viewpoint of the global standard. In additon based on the development of the argument about the interpretation of "the same effect as a final and binding judgment" in other dispute solution systems, I mentioned that the content and the scope of the binding effect of adjudications are not same as Res Judicata of judgments, but that should be decided from the viewpoint of a prospective dispute solution unit to each system.

Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements

仲裁判断の既判力をはじめとして、民事訴訟以外の民事紛争解決手続における中立的判断者の判断は、従来、確定判決の既判力との対比で論じられることが多かったところ、本研究は、各手続の内容は異なり、求められている紛争解決の内容も異なることから、確定判決の既判力と同一のものとして判断の拘束力を捉える必要はなく、手続に応じた判断の拘束力の在り方を検討すべきであるという視座を提供した。また、グローバル化がすすむ現在において、世界的な民事訴訟法の調和化の動きに照らして、既判力と訴訟物についての日本法の規律が非常に特殊であり、改めて検討する必要があることを示した。

Report

(4 results)
  • 2018 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2017 Research-status Report
  • 2016 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (6 results)

All 2018 2017 2016

All Journal Article (1 results) Book (5 results)

  • [Journal Article] 演習民事訴訟法2018

    • Author(s)
      渡部美由紀
    • Journal Title

      法学教室

      Volume: 457号 Pages: 124-125

    • NAID

      40021697727

    • Related Report
      2018 Annual Research Report
  • [Book] 現代民事手続の法理2017

    • Author(s)
      加藤 哲夫、本間 靖規、高田 昌宏
    • Total Pages
      820
    • Publisher
      弘文堂
    • ISBN
      9784335357053
    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
  • [Book] 講座実務家事事件手続法 上2017

    • Author(s)
      山本 和彦、松原 正明、金子 修
    • Total Pages
      662
    • Publisher
      日本加除
    • ISBN
      9784817844453
    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
  • [Book] 現代民事手続の法理2017

    • Author(s)
      加藤哲夫=本間靖規=高田昌宏編
    • Total Pages
      801
    • Publisher
      弘文堂
    • Related Report
      2016 Research-status Report
  • [Book] 民事手続法の現代的課題と理論的解明2017

    • Author(s)
      山本克己=笠井正俊=山田文編
    • Total Pages
      904
    • Publisher
      弘文堂
    • Related Report
      2016 Research-status Report
  • [Book] 民事訴訟法NBS2016

    • Author(s)
      渡部美由紀=鶴田滋=岡庭幹司
    • Total Pages
      272
    • Publisher
      日本評論社
    • Related Report
      2016 Research-status Report

URL: 

Published: 2016-04-21   Modified: 2020-03-30  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi