Civil Access to Justice for Sexual Minorities
| Project/Area Number |
16K03454
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
New fields of law
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Otemon Gakuin University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
大塚 浩 奈良女子大学, 生活環境科学系, 准教授 (30324958)
草山 太郎 追手門学院大学, 地域創造学部, 准教授 (80331776)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2016-04-01 – 2020-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2019)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥4,030,000 (Direct Cost: ¥3,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥930,000)
Fiscal Year 2019: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 民事司法アクセス / 性的少数者 / LGBT / 同性婚 / セクシャルマイノリティ / 相談 / 承認 / 配分 / 司法アクセス / 性的マイノリティ / 社会運動 / 法社会学 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Sexual minority people also experience legal troubles and use various counseling organizations just like other people. However, even if they use consultation agencies when they experience sexual content trouble like a molester, some consultation agencies do not take it seriously because of their sexual orientations. And rumors of having had such an experience are spreading among them. As a result, some of them will not use consultation institutions, and consult only in their companion even if they experienced legal troubles because they are afraid of such experiences again. In that sense, it became clear that civil justice access was not sufficiently guaranteed for sexual minorities.
|
| Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
民事司法アクセスについては、『司法制度改革審議会意見書』に基づいて、弁護士増員が図られたり、法テラスが設置されるなど、様々な改善が図られ、一定の効果を上げている。これは、多くの市民にとっては民事司法アクセスに対する改善と言えるかもしれない。だが、性的少数者というマイノリティの司法アクセスの現状という点でいうならば、こうしたマイノリティにとっては、司法アクセスの改善は、単に地理的あるいは経済的な面でのアクセス障壁をなくすだけではなく、実質的な意味で相談機関となる関係者の偏見をなくさなければ改善しないということである。
|
Report
(5 results)
Research Products
(24 results)
