• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Preparation of questionnaire for a detecting deception

Research Project

Project/Area Number 16K13510
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Research Field Experimental psychology
Research InstitutionKansai University of International Studies

Principal Investigator

Nakayama Makoto  関西国際大学, 人間科学部, 教授 (60554988)

Project Period (FY) 2016-04-01 – 2019-03-31
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2018)
Budget Amount *help
¥3,380,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥780,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥650,000 (Direct Cost: ¥500,000、Indirect Cost: ¥150,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥2,080,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥480,000)
Keywords探索質問法 / 皮膚伝導度反応 / 自由再生テスト / 情報検出 / 犯行時の記憶 / 心拍率 / 非限定項目 / 裁決項目の選択基準 / 事件内容の認識 / テロ行為の計画と実行 / CIT / 精神生理学的虚偽検出 / 模擬犯罪 / 呼吸運動 / 虚偽検出 / SCR / GAT
Outline of Final Research Achievements

The concealed information test (CIT) focuses on participants’ recognition of the critical question rather than focusing on identifying deceptive answers. This experiment was designed to examine the validity of the CIT in a situation that resembled a true crime. Twenty-six participants who committed a mock theft were given a free-recall test about information concerning their crime scene after a delay of seven or more days. Although the realistic procedure was associated with a lower recall rate on some questions, the results indicated that central information was significantly easier to remember than peripheral details. Practical implications of these results are discussed.

Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements

本研究では事件内容の認識の有無から、当該犯罪に関わったかどうかを検討してきた。まず最初に窃盗事件について、実験参加者の自主的な目的物の探索行動を促すという意味で実務検査に近い状態を取り入れ、また,動機づけを高めるようにパフォーマンスに応じた報酬を与えた。その結果、被害品の置き場所に関する質問がきわめて有効であることを確認した。その後は、テロ事件に関する検討をいくつかおこない、実行群と計画群の識別や非限定項目(キャッチオール項目)を追加することで、有罪群を誤って無罪と判定することがないような手続きを明らかにした。

Report

(4 results)
  • 2018 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2017 Research-status Report
  • 2016 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (5 results)

All 2018 2017

All Presentation (5 results)

  • [Presentation] SCITによる意図的テロ行為の検出2018

    • Author(s)
      中山誠
    • Organizer
      日本心理学会
    • Related Report
      2018 Annual Research Report
  • [Presentation] テロ対策のためのSearching CIT2018

    • Author(s)
      中山誠
    • Organizer
      日本犯罪心理学会
    • Related Report
      2018 Annual Research Report
  • [Presentation] CITの質問作成の検討2017

    • Author(s)
      中山 誠
    • Organizer
      日本生理心理学会
    • Place of Presentation
      江戸川学園大学
    • Year and Date
      2017-05-27
    • Related Report
      2016 Research-status Report
  • [Presentation] CIT における裁決項目の最適な選択2017

    • Author(s)
      中山誠
    • Organizer
      日本心理学会
    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
  • [Presentation] CITの質問作成の検討2017

    • Author(s)
      中山誠
    • Organizer
      日本生理心理学会
    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report

URL: 

Published: 2016-04-21   Modified: 2020-03-30  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi