| Project/Area Number |
16K13570
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research
|
| Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
|---|
| Research Field |
Education on school subjects and activities
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Tokyo Gakugei University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2016-04-01 – 2019-03-31
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2018)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥3,120,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,400,000、Indirect Cost: ¥720,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥1,300,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,000,000、Indirect Cost: ¥300,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥780,000 (Direct Cost: ¥600,000、Indirect Cost: ¥180,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | 板書 / 授業研究 / 授業評価 / 研究授業 |
|---|
| Outline of Final Research Achievements |
Focusing on research lessons, I intended to evaluate the lessons by asking both children and teachers to point to "What is the most important part in today's lesson?" on the blackboard at the conclusion of the lessons. However, it was difficult to collect data from children immediately after the lessons, therefore data were collected only from teachers.
As a result, a tendency to emphasize "summary" was found, and it became clear that there were many teachers who considered "important" when "summary" was written in the language of the children. On the other hand, some teachers also pointed out that the "Neriage (kneading up)" scene is important. So far, no clear pattern has been found. I categorized the board writing in "content" or "process" and found that there was almost no description about "process".This finding suggests a new approach to lesson evaluation.
|
| Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements |
授業の評価は、逐語記録を作成するなど多大な時間と労力を要する。簡便でかつ有効な評価方法はないか、というのが本研究の動機である。
授業の国際比較により、わが国の算数数学の授業では、板書を消さない傾向が顕著であることが判明している。そこで本研究では、この特徴を授業評価に活用することを試みた。具体的には、研究授業に焦点を当て、１時間の授業の全体像が残っている板書について、授業直後に「今日の授業で重要な箇所はどこか」を授業を観た教師と児童に指し示してもらうことにした。研究の結果、明確なパターンは見出せなかったが、思考の過程に関する記述が殆どないことが判明し、授業評価への新しい手がかりが得られた。
|
