Theory and practice of urban management in Germany
Project/Area Number |
16K18213
|
Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
|
Allocation Type | Multi-year Fund |
Research Field |
Town planning/Architectural planning
|
Research Institution | University of Hyogo (2017) Fukuyama City University (2016) |
Principal Investigator |
Ota Naotaka 兵庫県立大学, 環境人間学部, 准教授 (30650262)
|
Project Period (FY) |
2016-04-01 – 2018-03-31
|
Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2017)
|
Budget Amount *help |
¥2,470,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,900,000、Indirect Cost: ¥570,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,430,000 (Direct Cost: ¥1,100,000、Indirect Cost: ¥330,000)
|
Keywords | ドイツ / ハンブルク / BID / HID / 都市マネジメント / エリアマネジメント / 公民連携 / 計画制度 / まちづくり / 都市計画・建築計画 / 都市整備 |
Outline of Final Research Achievements |
The aim of this study to describe the implementation status of BIDs (Business Improvement Districts) and HIDs (Housing Improvement Districts) in Germany. The following points were clarified as a result of the study: 1) In Germany, there were BIDs in 6 states, 18 cities, and 35 districts as of February 2016, and they are used to solve individual district issues for a specific time period, primarily in existing urban areas. 2) The institutional characteristics of BIDs and HIDs are quite similar, but a large divergence is evident in the number of implementations. 3) HIDs have been implemented in large-scale housing projects with structural problems in Hamburg, but it’s difficult to revitalize a district with an HID alone. 4) BIDs and HIDs exist only in a form added onto existing publicly-initiated services and programs, but as a means for the private side to solve district issues on their own initiative, it can be one option.
|
Report
(3 results)
Research Products
(4 results)