• Search Research Projects
  • Search Researchers
  • How to Use
  1. Back to previous page

Boundaries between Orthodox Medicine and Alternative Medicine

Research Project

Project/Area Number 16K21422
Research Category

Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)

Allocation TypeMulti-year Fund
Research Field Sociology/History of science and technology
History of Europe and America
Research InstitutionMeiji University

Principal Investigator

Kurosaki Shuichi  明治大学, 文学部, 兼任講師 (10772246)

Project Period (FY) 2016-04-01 – 2019-03-31
Project Status Completed (Fiscal Year 2018)
Budget Amount *help
¥2,860,000 (Direct Cost: ¥2,200,000、Indirect Cost: ¥660,000)
Fiscal Year 2018: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2017: ¥910,000 (Direct Cost: ¥700,000、Indirect Cost: ¥210,000)
Fiscal Year 2016: ¥1,040,000 (Direct Cost: ¥800,000、Indirect Cost: ¥240,000)
Keywordsイギリス史 / 西洋史 / 医学史 / 境界設定 / 科学的医学
Outline of Final Research Achievements

In this study, I examine the formation of scientific medicine in Victorian Britain with particular reference to the conflicts between homoeopathy and orthodox medicine. To clarify the definition of scientific medicine, orthodox physicians expelled homoeopathic practitioners from hospitals, medical journals and societies. Furthermore, criticising the dogmatism of homoeopathy, they labelled it as ‘medical heresy’. However, there was persistent opposition to this exclusion even among orthodox physicians.Many people thought that clarifying the boundaries would harm the project of making medicine scientific.
It is certain that there was fierce competition between homoeopathy and orthodox medicine. However, the demarcation lines between them were not the only issues. For the purpose of making medicine scientific, doctors in Victorian Britain had to express a degree of tolerance of homoeopathy. This study will be published in summer 2019.

Academic Significance and Societal Importance of the Research Achievements

近年,世界中で隆盛を極める代替医療に対しては,これを科学的な医療の実現の障害とみなし,「根拠に基づく医療(EBM)」の基準に照らして淘汰しようとする動きが活発である。しかしその一方で,そもそも科学的な医療とは何か,科学とは何かという,より根本的な議論が置き去りにされているという指摘もある。そこで本研究は,正統医学と代替医療の境界線の構築をめぐる歴史的な経緯を明らかにすることで,この科学的な医療とは何かという問題への理解を深める一助となることを目指した。

Report

(4 results)
  • 2018 Annual Research Report   Final Research Report ( PDF )
  • 2017 Research-status Report
  • 2016 Research-status Report
  • Research Products

    (4 results)

All 2019 2017 2016

All Journal Article (1 results) (of which Peer Reviewed: 1 results,  Acknowledgement Compliant: 1 results) Presentation (2 results) Book (1 results)

  • [Journal Article] 「ハーネマンとは何者か? ―ヴィクトリア朝イギリスにおけるホメオパシーの受容と再構築―」2016

    • Author(s)
      黒﨑周一
    • Journal Title

      『駿台史学』

      Volume: 第158号 Pages: 51-73

    • Related Report
      2016 Research-status Report
    • Peer Reviewed / Acknowledgement Compliant
  • [Presentation] 商機としての異端医学 ―ヴィクトリア朝イギリスのホメオパシーと科学的医学の形成―2017

    • Author(s)
      黒﨑周一
    • Organizer
      社会経済史学会
    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
  • [Presentation] 「ディズレイリの死とホメオパシー ―ヴィクトリア朝イギリスの科学的医学に関する一考察―2017

    • Author(s)
      黒﨑周一
    • Organizer
      同志社大学人文科学研究所第5研究会例会
    • Related Report
      2017 Research-status Report
  • [Book] ホメオパシーとヴィクトリア朝イギリスの医学2019

    • Author(s)
      黒﨑周一
    • Total Pages
      340
    • Publisher
      刀水書房
    • ISBN
      4887084544
    • Related Report
      2018 Annual Research Report

URL: 

Published: 2016-04-21   Modified: 2020-03-30  

Information User Guide FAQ News Terms of Use Attribution of KAKENHI

Powered by NII kakenhi