| Project/Area Number |
17310111
|
|---|
| Research Category |
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
|
| Allocation Type | Single-year Grants |
|---|
| Section | 一般 |
|---|
| Research Field |
Natural disaster science
|
|---|
| Research Institution | Fuji Tokoha University |
|---|
Principal Investigator |
SHIGEKAWA Kishie Fuji Tokoha University, College of Environment and Disaster Research, Professor, 環境防災学部, 教授 (10329576)
|
|---|
| Co-Investigator(Kenkyū-buntansha) |
IKEDA Hirotaka Fuji Tokoha University, College of Environment and Disaster Research, Professor, 環境防災学部, 教授 (80340131)
TANAKA Satoshi Fuji Tokoha University, College of Environment and Disaster Research, Associate Professor, 環境防災学部, 助教授 (90273523)
TOKI Kenzo Ritsumeikan University, College of Science and Engineering, Professor, 理工学部, 教授 (10027229)
NAKAGAWA Hajime Kyoto University, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Professor, 防災研究所, 教授 (80144393)
TAKASHIMA Masasuke Fuji Tokoha University, College of Environment and Disaster Research, Associate Professor, 環境防災学部, 助教授 (60424909)
|
|---|
| Project Period (FY) |
2005 – 2006
|
| Project Status |
Completed (Fiscal Year 2006)
|
| Budget Amount *help |
¥15,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥15,500,000)
Fiscal Year 2006: ¥7,500,000 (Direct Cost: ¥7,500,000)
Fiscal Year 2005: ¥8,000,000 (Direct Cost: ¥8,000,000)
|
|---|
| Keywords | disaster information / disaster ethnography / Mid-Niigata Earthquake / 感染症 / 危険度 / 危険度情報 / 災害対応 / 地震発生確率 / JR福知山線脱線事故 |
|---|
| Research Abstract |
There are three methods expressing vulnerability to disaster. Blindness in one eye uses probability theory expressions, such as occurrence probability of an earthquake. The 2nd is a standard specified with the size of the hazard seen scientifically. For example, it is a weather warning etc. The 3rd is a standard specified with the size of damage based on an engineering view. For example, it is the collapse danger of a building etc. However, it is difficult for the citizen who received the information to understand the urgency nature of danger in these modes of expression. Furthermore, there was a limit that it could not judge what kind of correspondence should be carried out concretely. This research was intelligible for the citizen and examined the mode of expression of the danger which can decide how citizens judge and should act further. The time of the disaster generated in the past, such as the 2004 Niigata heavy rain disaster, Toyooka flood damage, a 2004 Mid-Niigata Earthquake d
… More
isaster, JR Fukuchiyama Line train derailment accident, and hurricane Katorina, was made into the example. Disaster ethnography investigation to the pursuer and disaster victim corresponding to disaster when such disaster occurs was conducted. The factor which specifies the cognition of their danger and the action corresponding to disaster was clarified, and the information which brought influence to judgment and decision-making was analyzed. Moreover, the information which resulted in change to the action corresponding to disaster was analyzed. Furthermore, the data of the investigation at the time of disaster was arranged, and disaster ESUNOGU Rafi was created. The workshop was held based on it. As a result, in order for civil society to accept danger information and to connect to suitable disaster prevention action, it turned out only by presentation of danger information that there is a limit. Moreover, a feeling of a vicarious experience of the disaster brought about by disaster ethnography who can read the past disaster situation etc. in detail and understanding of a disaster process simultaneously became clear. Less
|
